“机不可失，时不再来”指的是___

是 ___

在客观规律面前，人的主观能动性表现在___

事物的联系和运动之间的关系___

唯物辩证法的总特征是___

___

“割下来的手就不再是人手”这句话体现了___

唯物辩证法认为发展的实质是___

区分新事物和旧事物的标志在于看它们___

质量互变规律揭示了___

质和事物的存在是___

在实际工作中，要注意掌握分寸，防止“过”或“不及”，其关键在于___

区分量变和质变的根本标志是看___

量变的复杂性是指___

量变中的阶段性部分质变表现了___

量变中的局部性部分质变是___

揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___

“肯定和否定相互渗透，在一定意义上，肯定就是否定。”这是一种___

事物的否定方面是指___

作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___

辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___

否定之否定规律___

事物发展的周期性体现了___

直线论的错误在于只看到___

循环论的错误在于___

对立统一规律揭示了___

唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___

辩证法所说的矛盾是指___

矛盾的基本属性是___

依据是___

矛盾问题的精髓是___

题的方法都是___

“任何个别（无论怎样）都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___

在唯物辩证法看来，水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___

“是就是是，不是就是不是，除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___

真象和假象的区别在于___

有的哲学家说，在大风扬起的尘土中，每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___

“或然率”是指___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___

Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___

管道企业在紧急情况下进行管道抢修作业 ,可以先行使用他人土地或者设施 ,但应当及时告知土地或者设施的（）和（）。 ___

管道企业发生管道事故 ,未采取有效措施消除或者减轻事故危害的 ,由县级以上地方人民政府主管管道保护工作的部门责令限期整改 ;逾期不改正的 ,处( )以上( )以下的罚款。 ___

采用移动、切割、打孔、砸撬、拆卸等手段损坏管道或者盗窃、哄抢管道输送、泄漏、排放的石油、天然气 ,尚不构成犯罪的 ,依法给予什么处罚 ?( )___

《石油天然气管道保护法》于何时起实施 ?( )___

管道保护工作坚持（）的原则，建立政府领导、部门监管、社会监督和管道企业负责的机制，落实和强化管道企业的主体责任。___

县级以上人民政府发展和改革（能源）主管部门、公安机关依照《浙江省石油天然气管道建设和保护条例》的规定作出责令限期拆除的决定后，当事人逾期不拆除的，由作出责令限期拆除决定的部门报请本级人民政府责成有关部门依法强制拆除。强制拆除的费用，由（）承担。___

违反《中华人民共和国石油天然气管道保护法》和《浙江省石油天然气管道建设和保护条例》规定，实施危害管道安全行为的，由县级以上人民政府（）责令停止违法行为或者责令改正。___

纳入城乡规划的管道建设用地，不得擅自改变用途。县级以上人民政府（）不得在管道建设用地范围内批准妨碍管道建设的其他建设项目。___

石油和天然气首选的输送方式为（）。___

石油天然气管道是一个（）的输送系统。___

（）受理土地复垦验收申请后，应当会同同级农业、林业、环境保护等部门组织土地复垦验收。___

由县级以上人民政府发展和改革（能源）主管部门责令限期改正的管道企业，逾期不改正的，对直接负责的主管人员和其他直接责任人员，由有权机关依法给予（）。___

石油天然气管道防护方案或者改线方案应当经专家评审论证后，报管道所在地县（市、区）发展和改革主管部门批准；涉及的管道跨设区的市的，报（）批准。___

土地利用总体规划和城乡规划的修改，涉及现有管道改建、搬迁的，应当征求管道企业的意见；确需管道改建、搬迁或者增加防护设施的，（）确定补偿方案。___

管道建成后应当按照国家有关规定进行竣工验收，（）发展和改革（能源）主管部门应当组织管道保护方面的专家进行专项验收。___

管道标记均应设置在管道正输方向的（）。___

（）是减少石油天然气管道第三方破坏事故的有效方法。___

违章建筑占压石油天然气管道属于第三方损伤中的（）。___

县级以上人民政府（）主管部门依照《浙江省石油天然气管道建设和保护条例》规定的职责，负责本行政区域内管道建设和保护的监督管理工作，以及危害管道安全违法行为的查处，指导、监督管道企业履行管道保护义务。___

《输气管道工程设计规范》GB50251—2003规定管道在水田中的最小埋深应为（）。___

管道的（）应当与管道主体工程同时设计、同时施工、同时投入使用。___

县级以上人民政府（）依照本条例规定的职责，负责本行政区域内管道保护的相关监督管理工作，以及危害管道安全违法行为的查处。___

《浙江省石油天然气管道建设和保护条例》适用于本省行政区域内输送（）管道以及管道附属设施（以下统称管道）的建设和保护。___

在常温常压下，天然气爆炸极限是（）。___

违反《浙江省石油天然气管道建设和保护条例》规定，实施危害管道安全行为的，由县级以上人民政府（）对违法修建的建筑物或者其他设施，责令限期拆除，并处以罚款。___

《浙江省石油天然气管道建设和保护条例》已于（）经浙江省第十二届人民代表大会常务委员会第十一次会议通过。___

县级以上人民政府应当组织排除管道的重大（）安全隐患，加强管道保护执法机构和队伍建设。___

下列四种植物中，石油天然气管道线路中心线两侧各五米地域范围内可以种植的是（）。___

任何单位和个人实施危害管道安全行为的，由县级以上人民政府发展和改革（能源）主管部门责令改正；情节严重的，处（）罚款。___

施工单位在管道线路中心线两侧各（）以及管道附属设施周边一百米地域范围内，进行新建、改建、扩建铁路、公路、河渠，架设电力线路，埋设地下电缆、光缆，设置安全接地体、避雷接地体等施工作业时，应当向管道所在地县级以上人民政府发展和改革（能源）主管部门提出申请。___

天然气是一种混合气体，其主要成分是（）。___

天然气管道线路“三桩”通常指（）。___

运行人员可应根据作业实际情况，采取（ ）等方式，对作业进行监护、监督检查，并做好记录。___

电机运行中，应观察运行情况及相关参数，发现有异常声响、（ ）等情况，应立即停运。___

（ ）应由熟练的值班员操作，站场负责人监护。___

动火工作间断后，重新动火前动火（ ）必须重新检查安全措施的落实情况，并按要求再次填写《动火现场检查记录表》，检查内容确认完成后方可进入许可签字程序。___

工作过程所涉及的（ ）等设备的设定或技术参数，运行条件等发生变化的，应在工作完成情况及说明中详细说明，并由检修和运行双方签字确认。___

（ ）等恶劣条件下应尽可能避免和减少工艺操作。___

编制调度运行方案和特殊运行方案时，应充分考虑管网运行压力（ ）等因素，并有专门的应急措施___

当（ ）不能满足下游用户用气需求，严重影响管网安全运行时，当班调度应按有序用气有关规定及时采取限供气措施，并启动相应应急预案。___