【单选题】
量变中的阶段性部分质变表现了___
A. 事物内部各部分之间变化的不平衡性
B. 事物整体与某些构成部分之间变化的不平衡性
C. 事物与事物之间变化的不平衡性
D. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化的不平衡性
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
答案
D
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【单选题】
量变中的局部性部分质变是___
A. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化不平衡性的表现
B. 事物的各个部分之间变化不平衡性的表现
C. 事物的内部矛盾和外部条件变化不平衡性的表现
D. 事物的量和质变化不平衡性的表现
【单选题】
揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展规律
【单选题】
“肯定和否定相互渗透,在一定意义上,肯定就是否定。”这是一种___
A. 相对主义诡辩论的观点
B. 唯物辩证法的观点
C. 主观唯心主义的观点
D. 形而上学的观点
【单选题】
事物的否定方面是指___
A. 事物的积极方面
B. 事物的消极方面
C. 事物中维持其存在的方面
D. 事物中促使其灭亡的方面
【单选题】
作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___
A. 既保留又继承
B. 彻底抛弃
C. 既克服又保留
D. 矛盾的调和
【单选题】
辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___
A. 把旧事物完全抛弃
B. 使旧事物发生量变
C. 是新事物产生、旧事物灭亡
D. 是从外部强加给事物的
【单选题】
否定之否定规律___
A. 在事物完成一个发展周期时才能完整地表现出来
B. 在事物发展过程中任何一点上都可以表现出来
C. 在事物经过量变和质变两种状态后表现出来
D. 在事物发展过程中经过肯定和否定两个阶段表现出来
【单选题】
事物发展的周期性体现了___
A. 事物发展的直线性与曲折性的统一
B. 事物发展是一个不断地回到出发点的运动
C. 事物发展的周而复始的循环性
D. 事物发展的前进性和曲折性的统一
【单选题】
直线论的错误在于只看到___
A. 事物发展的周期性而否认了前进性
B. 事物发展的前进性而否认了曲折性
C. 事物发展的间接性而否认了连续性
D. 事物发展的曲折性而否认了周期性
【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
【单选题】
对立统一规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋向
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
现代人才素质的灵魂是___。
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基础.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
A. 德育
B. 智育
C. 体育
D. 美育
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基本内容
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
推荐试题
【单选题】
23:投保机构应当交纳的保费,按照本投保机构的___和存款保险基金管理机构确定的适用费率计算。
A. 全部存款
B. 人民币存款
C. 被保险存款
【单选题】
24:存款保险基金的运用,应当遵循___的原则
A. 安全、流动、保值增值
B. 安全、流动、效益
C. 审慎、流动、保值增值
D. 审慎、流动、效益
【单选题】
25:存款保险基金的运用,应当遵循安全、流动、保值增值的原则,限于下列形式___:
A. 存放在中国人民银行
B. 投资政府债券、中央银行票据、信用等级较高的金融债券以及其他高等级债券
C. 国务院批准的其他资金运用形式
D. 以上选项都是
【单选题】
26:存款保险基金的收支应当遵守国家统一的财务会计制度,并依法接受___的审计监督。
A. 审计机关
B. 人民银行
C. 监察机关
D. 财政机关
【单选题】
27:存款保险基金管理机构应当自每一会计年度结束之日起___内编制存款保险基金收支的财务会计报告、报表,并编制年度报告,按照国家有关规定予以公布。
A. 1个月
B. 2个月
C. 3个月
D. 4个月
【单选题】
28:存款保险基金管理机构应当自每一会计年度结束之日起3个月内编制存款保险基金收支的___、报表,并编制年度报告,按照国家有关规定予以公布。
A. 财务审计报告
B. 财务收支报告
C. 财务决算报告
D. 财务会计报告
【单选题】
29:存款保险基金管理机构履行职责,发现有下列___情形之一的,可以进行核查:
A. 投保机构风险状况发生变化,可能需要调整适用费率的,对涉及费率计算的相关情况进行核查
B. 投保机构保费交纳基数可能存在问题的,对其存款的规模、结构以及真实性进行核查
C. 对投保机构报送的信息、资料的真实性进行核查
D. 以上选项都是
【单选题】
30:存款保险基金管理机构参加金融监督管理协调机制,并与___、银行业监督管理机构等金融管理部门、机构建立信息共享机制。
A. 中国人民银行
B. 中国证监会
C. 财政部
【单选题】
31:存款保险基金管理机构应当通过信息共享机制获取有关投保机构的风险状况、检查报告和___等监督管理信息。
A. 评价情况
B. 信用情况
C. 信誉情况
D. 评级情况
【单选题】
32:存款保险基金管理机构发现投保机构存在资本不足等影响存款安全以及存款保险基金安全的情形的,可以对其提出 ___。
A. 安全警示
B. 安全警告
C. 风险警示
D. 风险警告
【单选题】
33:投保机构因重大资产损失等原因导致资本充足率大幅度下降,严重危及存款安全以及存款保险基金安全的,投保机构应当按照___、中国人民银行、银行业监督管理机构的要求及时采取补充资本、控制资产增长、控制重大交易授信、降低杠杆率等措施。
A. 存款保险基金管理机构
B. 财政部
C. 国务院
【单选题】
34:存款保险基金管理机构可以选择下列___方式使用存款保险基金,保护存款人利益:
A. 在本条例规定的限额内直接偿付被保险存款
B. 委托其他合格投保机构在本条例规定的限额内代为偿付被保险存款
C. 为其他合格投保机构提供担保、损失分摊或者资金支持,以促成其收购或者承担被接管、被撤销或者申请破产的投保机构的全部或者部分业务、资产、负债。
D. 以上选项都是
【单选题】
35:存款保险基金管理机构应当依照本条例的规定,在前款规定情形发生之日起___个工作日内足额偿付存款。
A. 5
B. 7
C. 10
D. 15
【单选题】
36:存款保险基金管理机构的工作人员有下列___行为之一的,依法给予处分:
A. 违反规定收取保费
B. 违反规定使用、运用存款保险基金
C. 违反规定不及时、足额偿付存款。
D. 以上选项都是
【单选题】
37:投保机构有未依法及时、足额交纳保费情形的,存款保险基金管理机构还可以按日加收未交纳保费部分___的滞纳金。
A. 0.02%
B. 0.03%
C. 0.05%
D. 0.06%
【单选题】
38:存款保险条例施行前,已被国务院银行业监督管理机构依法决定接管、撤销或者人民法院已受理破产申请的___,不适用本条例。
A. 金融机构
B. 吸收存款的金融机构
C. 吸收存款的银行业金融机构
【单选题】
报警系统的设防、撤防、报警及视频监控图像、声音复核等信息的存储时间应不小于___天,出入口控制信息存储时间应不小于天。
A. 30,60
B. 60,90
C. 30,180
【单选题】
银行营业场所现金业务区以外展示的贵金属样品应为___,并明确标注。
A. 仿真品
B. 真品
【单选题】
银行营业场所外围有围墙的,高度应不小于___,并应设置防止爬越的障碍物或周界报警装置。
A. 1 m
B. 2m
C. 3m
【单选题】
柜体采用钢筋混凝土结构的,柜体厚度应不小于___,高度应不小于( )。
A. 240mm,800mm
B. 240mm,1000mm
C. 360mm,240mm
【单选题】
诱明防护板的防弹性能应达到GA165-1997中F79型___的要求;防砸性能应达到GA844-2009中( )的要求。
A. B级,A级
B. A级,B级
C. A级、A级
【单选题】
单块透明防护板宽度应不大于___,高度应不小于( ),单块面积应不大于( )。
A. 1.8m, 1.2m, 4㎡
B. 2m, 1.5m, 4㎡
C. 1.8m, 1.5m,4.5㎡
【单选题】
防尾随联动互锁安全门两道门之间的纵深度应不小于___。
A. 1m
B. 2m
C. 1.5m
【单选题】
紧急报警装置应设置不少于___的独立防区,每路防区上串联的紧急报警按钮不得多于( )。
A. 2路,5个
B. 2路,4个
C. 1路,4个
【单选题】
报警系统应采取___以上向外报警的传输方式。
A. 2种
B. 1种
C. 3种
【单选题】
银行营业场所与外界相通的出入口应安装摄像机,系统应能实时监控、记录出入营业场所人员情况和营业场所出入口___监控范围内情况,回放图像应能清晰显示往来人员的面部特征、车辆号牌等。同时,应能实时监控、记录银行营业场所出入口( )监控范围内情况,回放图像应能清晰显示往来人员体貌特征、车辆颜色、车型等。
A. 50m、100m
B. 20m, 50m
C. 50m, 80m
【单选题】
在行式自助银行与其他客户活动区相通的出入口应安装___。
A. 防盗安全门
B. 卷帘门
C. 防盗安金门或卷帘门
【单选题】
在行式自助银行、自助设备加钞间的出入口应设置___,门体强度应不低于GB17565-2007规定的( ),防盗锁应符合GAfT73-2015中( )的要求。
A. 防盗安全门,乙级,
B. 级 B、金库门,甲级,A级
C. 防盗门,丙级,A级
【单选题】
银行营业场所与外界相的出入口应安装防盗安全门,门体强度应不低于GB17565-2007规定的___,防盗锁应符合GB/T73-2015中( )的要求。
A. 乙级,A级
B. 甲级,B级
C. 乙级,B级
【多选题】
安全保卫检查的主要内容:上级安全保卫工作安排、会议精神和有关文件贯彻落实情况;___安全保卫部门人员配备情况; 其他需要检查的事项。
A. 安全保卫工作制度贯彻落实情况
B. 员工防范意识和执行规章制度、操作规程情况
C. 定期分析案件特点、作案手段、发案原因,及时提出防范意见
D. 安全防范设施建设和安防器材管理、使用情况
E. 各类刑事案件和治安、灾害事故查处情况
【多选题】
安全保卫检查以( )定期查与不定期查相结合,采取___的检查方法。
A. 普查和抽查、自查与互查
B. 白天查与晚上查、现场查与非现场查
C. 听(汇报)、看(现状)
D. 问(情况)、查(实况)、评(反馈意见)
【多选题】
上级或外部单位对营业场所、业务库进行检查的。检查时必须持有___经被查单位验证确认登记后,方可允许进入。
A. 检查单位介绍信
B. 并有被查单位保卫部门负责人陪同
C. 出示身份证
D. 非河南省农村信用社系统人员还需要工作证
【多选题】
有下列行为之一的,给予有关责任人经济处罚并视情节给予警告直至开除行政处分,触犯刑法的,移交司法机关处理___
A. 营业期间,大宗现金(抽屉内存放现金超过5 万元或存有整把现金)未入保险柜存放的
B. 营业终了未将现金、印鉴、密押、移动存储介质、有价单证、重要空白凭证入库保管的
C. 未按规定进行安全检查,致使安全隐患未发现或对检查出来的安全隐患不报告的
D. 营业期间接打电话的
E. 营业期间擅离职守,形成一人临柜的或无人临柜的
【多选题】
银行营业场所接待安全检查人员应做到___
A. 在没有本单位领导和保卫人员陪同的情况下,可以打开营业室通勤门让检查人员进入营业室进行检查
B. 请检查人员出示有关证件
C. 对检查人员提出的任何问题可以做解答
D. 检查人员出示相关手续后,营业人员必须接受检查人员的检查,并如实向检查人员反映情况
【多选题】
防尾随联动互锁安全门电控装置发生故障时,应能手动开启。发生紧急情况时,应有___和( )功能。
A. 双开应急开启
B. 钥匙开启
C. 双开强制复位
D. 身份证开启
【多选题】
技防设施系统运行主要检查___、值班、( )、( ),安全用电,( )的管理和使用情况。
A. 监控室及数据中心机房人员配备
B. 应急演练和突发事件处置能力
C. 监控室运行日志、安防设施运行登记
D. 环境卫生、设备完整
E. 视频监控、报警、消防设施
【多选题】
现金业务区应安装摄像机,系统应能( )等交易全过程,回放图像应能清晰显示( )及___。
A. 柜员活动情况
B. 实时监视、记录现金、贵金属
C. 每个客服业务办理全过程
D. 每个现金柜台柜员操作全过程
E. 客户的面部特征
【多选题】
新建改建营业网点、自助设备等安防设施,做到“四明确”即:___
A. 明确建设标准
B. 明确建设方案
C. 明确建设内容
D. 明确责任
E. 明确建设验收结算流程
【多选题】
安全保卫工作坚持( )的原则。各市县行社___为安全保卫工作第一责任人。
A. 领导班子集体负责
B. “谁主管,谁负责”
C. 主要负责人
D. 监事长
【多选题】
1:对公客户办理收单业务需要提供的资料包括___。
A. 营业执照
B. 法人身份证
C. 特约商户申请表
D. 商户公章
E. 房屋租赁协议或房产证复印件
F. 商户绑定账号