【单选题】
量变中的阶段性部分质变表现了___
A. 事物内部各部分之间变化的不平衡性
B. 事物整体与某些构成部分之间变化的不平衡性
C. 事物与事物之间变化的不平衡性
D. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化的不平衡性
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题

答案
D
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【单选题】
量变中的局部性部分质变是___
A. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化不平衡性的表现
B. 事物的各个部分之间变化不平衡性的表现
C. 事物的内部矛盾和外部条件变化不平衡性的表现
D. 事物的量和质变化不平衡性的表现
【单选题】
否定之否定规律___
A. 在事物完成一个发展周期时才能完整地表现出来
B. 在事物发展过程中任何一点上都可以表现出来
C. 在事物经过量变和质变两种状态后表现出来
D. 在事物发展过程中经过肯定和否定两个阶段表现出来
【单选题】
事物发展的周期性体现了___
A. 事物发展的直线性与曲折性的统一
B. 事物发展是一个不断地回到出发点的运动
C. 事物发展的周而复始的循环性
D. 事物发展的前进性和曲折性的统一
【单选题】
直线论的错误在于只看到___
A. 事物发展的周期性而否认了前进性
B. 事物发展的前进性而否认了曲折性
C. 事物发展的间接性而否认了连续性
D. 事物发展的曲折性而否认了周期性
【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
推荐试题
【单选题】
25:存款保险基金的运用,应当遵循安全、流动、保值增值的原则,限于下列形式___:
A. 存放在中国人民银行
B. 投资政府债券、中央银行票据、信用等级较高的金融债券以及其他高等级债券
C. 国务院批准的其他资金运用形式
D. 以上选项都是
【单选题】
27:存款保险基金管理机构应当自每一会计年度结束之日起___内编制存款保险基金收支的财务会计报告、报表,并编制年度报告,按照国家有关规定予以公布。
A. 1个月
B. 2个月
C. 3个月
D. 4个月
【单选题】
28:存款保险基金管理机构应当自每一会计年度结束之日起3个月内编制存款保险基金收支的___、报表,并编制年度报告,按照国家有关规定予以公布。
A. 财务审计报告
B. 财务收支报告
C. 财务决算报告
D. 财务会计报告
【单选题】
29:存款保险基金管理机构履行职责,发现有下列___情形之一的,可以进行核查:
A. 投保机构风险状况发生变化,可能需要调整适用费率的,对涉及费率计算的相关情况进行核查
B. 投保机构保费交纳基数可能存在问题的,对其存款的规模、结构以及真实性进行核查
C. 对投保机构报送的信息、资料的真实性进行核查
D. 以上选项都是
【单选题】
32:存款保险基金管理机构发现投保机构存在资本不足等影响存款安全以及存款保险基金安全的情形的,可以对其提出 ___。
A. 安全警示
B. 安全警告
C. 风险警示
D. 风险警告
【单选题】
33:投保机构因重大资产损失等原因导致资本充足率大幅度下降,严重危及存款安全以及存款保险基金安全的,投保机构应当按照___、中国人民银行、银行业监督管理机构的要求及时采取补充资本、控制资产增长、控制重大交易授信、降低杠杆率等措施。
A. 存款保险基金管理机构
B. 财政部
C. 国务院
【单选题】
34:存款保险基金管理机构可以选择下列___方式使用存款保险基金,保护存款人利益:
A. 在本条例规定的限额内直接偿付被保险存款
B. 委托其他合格投保机构在本条例规定的限额内代为偿付被保险存款
C. 为其他合格投保机构提供担保、损失分摊或者资金支持,以促成其收购或者承担被接管、被撤销或者申请破产的投保机构的全部或者部分业务、资产、负债。
D. 以上选项都是
【单选题】
36:存款保险基金管理机构的工作人员有下列___行为之一的,依法给予处分:
A. 违反规定收取保费
B. 违反规定使用、运用存款保险基金
C. 违反规定不及时、足额偿付存款。
D. 以上选项都是
【单选题】
37:投保机构有未依法及时、足额交纳保费情形的,存款保险基金管理机构还可以按日加收未交纳保费部分___的滞纳金。
A. 0.02%
B. 0.03%
C. 0.05%
D. 0.06%
【单选题】
38:存款保险条例施行前,已被国务院银行业监督管理机构依法决定接管、撤销或者人民法院已受理破产申请的___,不适用本条例。
A. 金融机构
B. 吸收存款的金融机构
C. 吸收存款的银行业金融机构
【单选题】
报警系统的设防、撤防、报警及视频监控图像、声音复核等信息的存储时间应不小于___天,出入口控制信息存储时间应不小于天。
A. 30,60
B. 60,90
C. 30,180
【单选题】
诱明防护板的防弹性能应达到GA165-1997中F79型___的要求;防砸性能应达到GA844-2009中( )的要求。
A. B级,A级
B. A级,B级
C. A级、A级
【单选题】
单块透明防护板宽度应不大于___,高度应不小于( ),单块面积应不大于( )。
A. 1.8m, 1.2m, 4㎡
B. 2m, 1.5m, 4㎡
C. 1.8m, 1.5m,4.5㎡
【单选题】
银行营业场所与外界相通的出入口应安装摄像机,系统应能实时监控、记录出入营业场所人员情况和营业场所出入口___监控范围内情况,回放图像应能清晰显示往来人员的面部特征、车辆号牌等。同时,应能实时监控、记录银行营业场所出入口( )监控范围内情况,回放图像应能清晰显示往来人员体貌特征、车辆颜色、车型等。
A. 50m、100m
B. 20m, 50m
C. 50m, 80m
【单选题】
在行式自助银行、自助设备加钞间的出入口应设置___,门体强度应不低于GB17565-2007规定的( ),防盗锁应符合GAfT73-2015中( )的要求。
A. 防盗安全门,乙级,
B. 级 B、金库门,甲级,A级
C. 防盗门,丙级,A级
【单选题】
银行营业场所与外界相的出入口应安装防盗安全门,门体强度应不低于GB17565-2007规定的___,防盗锁应符合GB/T73-2015中( )的要求。
A. 乙级,A级
B. 甲级,B级
C. 乙级,B级
【多选题】
安全保卫检查的主要内容:上级安全保卫工作安排、会议精神和有关文件贯彻落实情况;___安全保卫部门人员配备情况; 其他需要检查的事项。
A. 安全保卫工作制度贯彻落实情况
B. 员工防范意识和执行规章制度、操作规程情况
C. 定期分析案件特点、作案手段、发案原因,及时提出防范意见
D. 安全防范设施建设和安防器材管理、使用情况
E. 各类刑事案件和治安、灾害事故查处情况
【多选题】
安全保卫检查以( )定期查与不定期查相结合,采取___的检查方法。
A. 普查和抽查、自查与互查
B. 白天查与晚上查、现场查与非现场查
C. 听(汇报)、看(现状)
D. 问(情况)、查(实况)、评(反馈意见)
【多选题】
上级或外部单位对营业场所、业务库进行检查的。检查时必须持有___经被查单位验证确认登记后,方可允许进入。
A. 检查单位介绍信
B. 并有被查单位保卫部门负责人陪同
C. 出示身份证
D. 非河南省农村信用社系统人员还需要工作证
【多选题】
有下列行为之一的,给予有关责任人经济处罚并视情节给予警告直至开除行政处分,触犯刑法的,移交司法机关处理___
A. 营业期间,大宗现金(抽屉内存放现金超过5 万元或存有整把现金)未入保险柜存放的
B. 营业终了未将现金、印鉴、密押、移动存储介质、有价单证、重要空白凭证入库保管的
C. 未按规定进行安全检查,致使安全隐患未发现或对检查出来的安全隐患不报告的
D. 营业期间接打电话的
E. 营业期间擅离职守,形成一人临柜的或无人临柜的
【多选题】
银行营业场所接待安全检查人员应做到___
A. 在没有本单位领导和保卫人员陪同的情况下,可以打开营业室通勤门让检查人员进入营业室进行检查
B. 请检查人员出示有关证件
C. 对检查人员提出的任何问题可以做解答
D. 检查人员出示相关手续后,营业人员必须接受检查人员的检查,并如实向检查人员反映情况
【多选题】
技防设施系统运行主要检查___、值班、( )、( ),安全用电,( )的管理和使用情况。
A. 监控室及数据中心机房人员配备
B. 应急演练和突发事件处置能力
C. 监控室运行日志、安防设施运行登记
D. 环境卫生、设备完整
E. 视频监控、报警、消防设施
【多选题】
现金业务区应安装摄像机,系统应能( )等交易全过程,回放图像应能清晰显示( )及___。
A. 柜员活动情况
B. 实时监视、记录现金、贵金属
C. 每个客服业务办理全过程
D. 每个现金柜台柜员操作全过程
E. 客户的面部特征
【多选题】
1:对公客户办理收单业务需要提供的资料包括___。
A. 营业执照
B. 法人身份证
C. 特约商户申请表
D. 商户公章
E. 房屋租赁协议或房产证复印件
F. 商户绑定账号