【单选题】
事物的联系和运动之间的关系___
A. 相互联系构成运动
B. 运动和发展引起质变
C. 发展引起运动
D. 普遍联系和永恒发展
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
答案
A
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的总特征是___
A. 量变和质变的观点
B. 辩证否定的观点
C. 联系和发展的观点
D. 对立统一的观点
【单选题】
___
A. 事物的联系是普遍的、无条件的
B. 事物的联系是现实的、具体的
C. 事物的运动是客观的、绝对的
D. 事物发展的根本原因是事物的内部矛盾
【单选题】
“割下来的手就不再是人手”这句话体现了___
A. 形而上学片面的、孤立的观点
B. 辩证法普遍联系的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 诡辩论的观点
【单选题】
唯物辩证法认为发展的实质是___
A. 事物数量的增加
B. 事物根本性质的变化
C. 事物的一切运动变化
D. 新事物的产生和旧事物的灭亡
【单选题】
区分新事物和旧事物的标志在于看它们___
A. 是不是在新的历史条件下出现的
B. 是不是符合事物发展规律、有强大生命力
C. 是不是具有新形式和新特点
D. 是不是得到绝大多数人的承认
【单选题】
质量互变规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋势
【单选题】
质和事物的存在是___
A. 相互对立的
B. 相互包含的
C. 直接同一的
D. 相互转化的
【单选题】
在实际工作中,要注意掌握分寸,防止“过”或“不及”,其关键在于___
A. 抓住事物的主要矛盾
B. 确定事物的质
C. 认识事物的量
D. 把握事物的度
【单选题】
区分量变和质变的根本标志是看___
A. 事物的变化是否显著
B. 事物的变化是否迅速
C. 事物的某些属性是否发生了变化
D. 事物的变化是否超出度的范围
【单选题】
量变的复杂性是指___
A. 量变的程度发展不同
B. 量变形式的多样性和总的量变过程中有部分质变
C. 质变中有量的扩张
D. 量变有在度的范围内的变化和突破度的范围的变化
【单选题】
量变中的阶段性部分质变表现了___
A. 事物内部各部分之间变化的不平衡性
B. 事物整体与某些构成部分之间变化的不平衡性
C. 事物与事物之间变化的不平衡性
D. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化的不平衡性
【单选题】
量变中的局部性部分质变是___
A. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化不平衡性的表现
B. 事物的各个部分之间变化不平衡性的表现
C. 事物的内部矛盾和外部条件变化不平衡性的表现
D. 事物的量和质变化不平衡性的表现
【单选题】
揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展规律
【单选题】
“肯定和否定相互渗透,在一定意义上,肯定就是否定。”这是一种___
A. 相对主义诡辩论的观点
B. 唯物辩证法的观点
C. 主观唯心主义的观点
D. 形而上学的观点
【单选题】
事物的否定方面是指___
A. 事物的积极方面
B. 事物的消极方面
C. 事物中维持其存在的方面
D. 事物中促使其灭亡的方面
【单选题】
作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___
A. 既保留又继承
B. 彻底抛弃
C. 既克服又保留
D. 矛盾的调和
【单选题】
辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___
A. 把旧事物完全抛弃
B. 使旧事物发生量变
C. 是新事物产生、旧事物灭亡
D. 是从外部强加给事物的
【单选题】
否定之否定规律___
A. 在事物完成一个发展周期时才能完整地表现出来
B. 在事物发展过程中任何一点上都可以表现出来
C. 在事物经过量变和质变两种状态后表现出来
D. 在事物发展过程中经过肯定和否定两个阶段表现出来
【单选题】
事物发展的周期性体现了___
A. 事物发展的直线性与曲折性的统一
B. 事物发展是一个不断地回到出发点的运动
C. 事物发展的周而复始的循环性
D. 事物发展的前进性和曲折性的统一
【单选题】
直线论的错误在于只看到___
A. 事物发展的周期性而否认了前进性
B. 事物发展的前进性而否认了曲折性
C. 事物发展的间接性而否认了连续性
D. 事物发展的曲折性而否认了周期性
【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
【单选题】
对立统一规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋向
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
推荐试题
【填空题】
现金、证件、有价购物卡和市值___元及以上的贵重物品,车站在拾得后立即上报站区,___个工作日内未能确定失主的,将遗失物移交至站区。
【单选题】
当营业场所遭遇不法分子侵犯时,其处置方式是___。
A. 先报警、再反击、后防身
B. 先藏身、后报警、再反击
C. 先反击、再防身、后报警
D. 先撤离、后报警、在反击
【单选题】
银行自助设备、自助银行现金装填区安全门的钥匙和密码必须实行___制度,不准交叉交接使用,密码要定期更换。
A. 交接
B. 双人单向保管
C. 登记
【单选题】
县级行社保卫部门组织检查每年不少于___次;基层行社社负责人要每月( )次的常规检查。
A. 12、3
B. 12、4
C. 6、3
D. 6、4
【单选题】
公共场所发生火灾时,该公共场所的现场工作人员应___。
A. 迅速撤离
B. 抢救贵重物品
C. 组织引导在场群众疏散
【单选题】
下列不属于突发事件的是___。
A. 营业场所或周边地区发生异常情况
B. 营业场所遭遇持枪抢劫
C. 营业场所发生火灾
D. 某柜员因家中有急事提前办理交接班
【单选题】
报警系统的设防、撤防、报警及视频监控图像、声音复核等信息的存储时间应不小于( )天,出入口控制信息存储时间不应小于___天。
A. 60 90
B. 30 180
C. 90 180
D. 60 180
【单选题】
视频监控应实时监视、记录___及运钞交接全过程,回放图像应能清晰显示整个区域内人员的活动情况。
A. 营业柜员
B. 网点负责人
C. 运钞车停靠区
D. 网点保安
【单选题】
下列不属于技术防范设施的是___。
A. 视频监控系统
B. 报警系统
C. 数据中心机房
D. 无线通讯及有关的卫星定位系统
【单选题】
客户提取现金、特别是大额现金时,柜台工作人员应___
A. 提供优质服务
B. 提醒其注意安全防范
C. 注意观察周边情况
【单选题】
报警系统的设防、撤防、报警及视频监控图像、声音复核等信息的存储时间应不小于( )天,出入口控制信息存储时间应不小于___天。
A. 30,60
B. 60,90
C. 30,180
【单选题】
银行营业场所现金业务区以外展示的贵金属样品应为___,并明确标注。
A. 仿真品
B. 真品
【单选题】
银行营业场所外围有围墙的,高度应不小于___,并应设置防止爬越的障碍物或周界报警装置。
A. 1 m
B. 2m
C. 3m
【单选题】
柜体采用钢筋混凝土结构的,柜体厚度应不小于( ),高度应不小于___。
A. 240mm,800mm
B. 240mm,1000mm
C. 360mm,240mm
【单选题】
诱明防护板的防弹性能应达到GA165-1997中F79型( )的要求;防砸性能应达到GA844-2009中___的要求。
A. B级,A级
B. A级,B级
C. A级、A级
【单选题】
单块透明防护板宽度应不大于( ),高度应不小于( ),单块面积应不大于___。
A. 1.8m, 1.2m, 4㎡
B. 2m, 1.5m, 4㎡
C. 1.8m, 1.5m,4.5㎡
【单选题】
防尾随联动互锁安全门两道门之间的纵深度应不小于___。
A. 1m
B. 2m
C. 1.5m
【单选题】
紧急报警装置应设置不少于( )的独立防区,每路防区上串联的紧急报警按钮不得多于___。
A. 2路,5个
B. 2路,4个
C. 1路,4个
【单选题】
报警系统应采取___以上向外报警的传输方式。
A. 2种
B. 1种
C. 3种
【单选题】
银行营业场所与外界相通的出入口应安装摄像机,系统应能实时监控、记录出入营业场所人员情况和营业场所出入口( )监控范围内情况,回放图像应能清晰显示往来人员的面部特征、车辆号牌等。同时,应能实时监控、记录银行营业场所出入口___监控范围内情况,回放图像应能清晰显示往来人员体貌特征、车辆颜色、车型等。
A. 50m、100m
B. 20m, 50m
C. 50m, 80m
【单选题】
在行式自助银行与其他客户活动区相通的出入口应安装___。
A. 防盗安全门
B. 卷帘门
C. 防盗安金门或卷帘门
【单选题】
在行式自助银行、自助设备加钞间的出入口应设置( ),门体强度应不低于GB17565-2007规定的( ),防盗锁应符合GAfT73-2015中___的要求。
A. 防盗安全门,乙级,B级
B. 金库门,甲级,A级
C. 防盗门,丙级,A级
【单选题】
银行营业场所与外界相的出入口应安装防盗安全门,门体强度应不低于GB17565-2007规定的( ),防盗锁应符合GB/T73-2015中___的要求。
A. 乙级,A级
B. 甲级,B级
C. 乙级,B级
【单选题】
1:___以上的未成年人,以自己的劳动收入为主要生活来源的,视为完全民事行为能力人。
A. 14 周岁
B. 15周岁
C. 16周岁
D. 18周岁
【单选题】
2:___以上的未成年人为限制民事行为能力人,实施民事法律行为由其法定代理人代理或者经其法定代理人同意、追认,但是可以独立实施纯获利益的民事法律行为或者与其年龄、智力相适应的民事法律行为。
A. 6周岁
B. 7周岁
C. 8周岁
D. 10周岁
【单选题】
3:自然人下落不明满___的,利害关系人可以向人民法院申请宣告该自然人为失踪人。
A. 满一年
B. 满二年
C. 满三年
D. 满四年
【单选题】
1:固定资产,是指为提供金融商品服务、出租或经营管理而持有的,单位价值在___以上的,使用期限超过1年的有形资产。
A. 3000
B. 5000
C. 6000
D. 8000
【单选题】
2:低值易耗品摊销。指按规定摊销的低值易耗品。单价___元(含)以上在低值易耗品帐户摊销。
A. 200
B. 300
C. 500
D. 800
【单选题】
3:工会经费。在职工工资总额的___%以内据实列支,用于工会各项活动的开展以及为职工提供的各种公益性、救济性服务等项目。
A. 1
B. 2
C. 3
D. 4
【单选题】
4:支行凡使用不合规的票据未经总行认可进行列支的,对审批人处以票据金额___%的处罚,同时按不合规票据金额25%的比例相应调减其年度费用计划。
A. 5
B. 10
C. 20
D. 25
【单选题】
5:假设A银行对关联方自然人授信余额0.85亿元,对关联方法人授信余额0.65亿元,其中最大一家法人授信余额0.2亿元,A银行资产总额75亿元,各项贷款余额35亿元,资本净额7.5亿元,请问A银行的全部关联度是___
A. 18.6%
B. 20%
C. 24.3%
D. 2%
【单选题】
6:某商业银行上半年累计实现税后利润18亿元,年初总资产余额为3800亿元,6月末总资产余额为5300亿元,则报告期资产利润率为___
A. 0.47%
B. 0.68%
C. 0.79%
D. 0.94%
【单选题】
7:在不良贷款率、拨备覆盖率和拨备贷款比率三者之间的关系,以下正确的为___
A. 拨备覆盖率=不良贷款率*拨备贷款比率
B. 拨备贷款比率=拨备覆盖率*不良贷款率
C. 不良贷款率=拨备覆盖率*拨备贷款比率
D. 以上均不对
【单选题】
8:2017年初,A农商银行贷款正常类贷款500亿元,当年发放正常类贷款100亿元。年初的500亿元正常类贷款中,期末收回80亿元,仍维持正常类360亿元,转为关注类、次级类、可疑类、损失类各10亿元,有20亿元期间转为不良贷款后,重组收回抵债资产,经拍卖收回现金15亿元,核销5亿元。进行调整后的正常类贷款迁徙率为___
A. 8%
B. 10%
C. 12%
D. 15%
【单选题】
1:电子现金账户(金燕IC卡中的子账户),该账户最高转入资金( ),单笔最高支付金额不得超过___人民币。
A. 500元,500元
B. 500元,1000元
C. 1000元,1000元
D. 1000元,2000元
【单选题】
2:我行金燕卡省外农信柜面取现,手续费收取标准___。
A. 每笔按取款金额的0 8%,最低1元,最高20元
B. 每笔按取款金额的0 5%,最低1元,最高20元
C. 2元+交易金额的0 5%(其中按交易金额的的0 5%计算部分最低收费2元)
D. 2元+交易金额的0 8%(其中按交易金额的的0 5%计算部分最低收费2元)
【单选题】
3:我行金燕卡在我行自助设备上的转账限额___。
A. 单日5万元,日累计5万元
B. 单日5万元,日累计10万元
C. 单日5000元,日累计2万元
D. 单日5000元,日累计5万元
【单选题】
4:某日,一客户前来咨询:我有一张在杭州市宁波银行开的储蓄卡,在你们行的ATM上取款手续费怎么收? ___
A. 2元+交易金额的0 5%(其中按交易金额的的0 5%计算部分最低收费2元)
B. 12元+取款金额的1%
C. 金额≤1万,收3元/笔, 1万元<金额≤5万元,收5元/笔。
D. 咨询发卡行
【单选题】
5:采用UK认证方式的个人网银限额是多少?___
A. 单笔500万元,单日累计2000万元
B. 单笔5万元,单日累计5万元
C. 单笔500万元,单日累计5000万元
D. 单笔5万元,单日累计20万元
【单选题】
6:企业网银限额是多少?___
A. 单笔500万元,单日累计2000万元
B. 单笔5万元,单日累计5万元
C. 单笔500万元,单日累计5000万元
D. 单笔5万元,单日累计20万元