【多选题】
关于个人外汇现钞管理说法正确的有___
A. 以外币现金形式存入的外币账户是现钞账户
B. 个人存入外币现钞当日累计等值5000美元(含5000美元)以下的,可以在银行直接办理
C. 个人提取外币现钞当日累计等值5000美元以下(含5000美元)的凭本人有效身份证件办理
D. 外币个人通知存款的每笔起存金额和最低支取金额均为5000美元或等值外币,只有七天通知期限
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
答案
ABD
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【多选题】
我行开办个人外汇业务的币种暂定为___,在本行系统中的货币代码为( )。
A. 港币、货币符号 HKD
B. 美元、货币符号 USD
C. 日元、货币符号 JPY
D. 欧元、货币符号
E. UR
【多选题】
金兰保单笔起存金额为___元。
A. 5000
B. 1万
C. 2万
D. 无限制
【多选题】
目前的金兰保期限是___年,可提前支取。
A. 3
B. 4
C. 5
D. 6
【多选题】
金兰保存满一年后提前支取,每年支付利息日至销户日部分未满___个月的,按存入日挂牌活期利率支付。
A. 一
B. 二
C. 三
D. 四
【多选题】
金兰保是以___的整数倍递增。
A. 1000
B. 5000
C. 10000
D. 50000
【多选题】
王先生于2015年5月1日在我行存了5万元的金兰保产品,2016年2月1日前来销户,那么应如何计息___
A. 存入日活期利率
B. 销户日获取利率
C. 三个月
D. 六个月
【多选题】
“金兰保”单笔起存点为___万元,按照()整数倍数递增。
A. 10000 1000
B. 20000 1000
C. 10000 10000
D. 20000 1000
【多选题】
客户要更改金兰保的入账需填写___
A. 个人客户综合开户申请表
B. 个人客户综合变更申请表
C. “金兰保”产品协议
D. “金兰保”产品协议
【多选题】
“金兰保”产品的申购期为___
A. 办理后1天
B. 办理后3天
C. 办理后7天
D. 无申购期
【多选题】
下列产品,不支持部分提前支取的是___
A. 金兰保
B. 金利保
C. 卡内约定转存的定期
D. 普通定期6个月
E. 金兰花保本理财产品
【多选题】
以下金额中,哪些可存我行的金兰保储蓄存款___
A. 1万
B. 2万
C. 2.5万
D. 5万
【多选题】
可以作为“金兰保”入账账户的有___
A. 兰花磁条卡
B. 兰花IC卡
C. 绍兴银行存折
D. 他行IC卡
【多选题】
关于金兰保利息入账账号维护,以下说法正确的有___
A. 客户必须提供有效身份证件,可以代理
B. 柜员需审核客户提供的“金兰保”定期存单信息,是否真实、完整
C. 客户需提供新绑定账户的相关凭证
D. 客户需填写《个人客户综合变更申请表》
【多选题】
代理人来办理金兰保后,柜员传票附件包括___
A. “金兰保”业务协议书
B. 金兰保存单
C. “金兰保”产品说明
D. 本人和代理人身份证复印件
【多选题】
关于金兰保业务描述正确的是___
A. 利息入账账号可维护,但客户必须提供有效身份证件,不可代理,仅本人可办理
B. 客户需提供新绑定账户的相关凭证(磁条卡、IC卡、存折),且只能绑定本人名下的账户
C. 若客户为转账销户,需提供入账账户凭证(卡、存折),且户名一致
D. 金兰保密码当日累计输错五次密码将锁定,必须做密码挂失
【多选题】
关于金兰保说法正确的有___
A. “金兰保”是个人定期储蓄存款
B. 每年付息、靠档计息,支取灵活,存款利息相对较高
C. 金兰保支持部分提前支取,靠档计息
D. 金兰保到期不自动转存
【多选题】
我行存在客户号的客户客户只开立金兰保存单不需要填写以下哪些表格___
A. 开户申请表
B. 金兰保产品说明书
C. 金兰保业务协议书
D. 变更申请书
【多选题】
以下储蓄创新产品中,可以由代理人办理的品种是___。
A. 金兰保
B. 金利保
C. 定存冠
D. 定利多
【多选题】
以下关于“金兰保”产品说法正确的有___
A. 如有需要,客户本人可以到开户网点凭本人身份证修改密码
B. 申请人办理“金兰保”产品时,需绑定在我行开立的个人结算账户用于每年利息入账
C. 金兰保”产品需本人带身份证到绍兴银行任一网点办理,不得代办
D. “金兰保”产品期满后逾期部分按照支取日挂牌公告的活期储蓄存款利率计息
【多选题】
金利保产品,单笔起步点为___元,按照()元整数倍递增,存期()年。
A. 10000,10000,1
B. 1000,1000,1
C. 10000,1000,1
D. 1000,10000,6
【多选题】
金利保最长期限为___年。
A. 1
B. 2
C. 3
D. 4
【多选题】
金利保密码当日累计输错 5次,密码锁定,次日自动解锁,总计达___必须密码挂失。
A. 15次
B. 10次
C. 8次
D. 以上都错
【多选题】
“金利保”是一款___年期的人民币个人定期存款产品。
A. 1
B. 3
C. 5
D. 6
【多选题】
金利保___存期适用于利率按支取日基准利率上浮40% 。
A. 一年
B. 3个月≤T<6个月
C. 6个月≤T<1年
D. T < 3个月
【多选题】
金利保如何靠档计息?(T表示天数)___
A. 1天≤T<7天,1天通知存款,支取日基准利率上浮25%
B. 7天≤T<3个月,7天通知存款,支取日基准利率上浮25%
C. 3个月≤T<6个月,3个月整存整取,支取日基准利率上浮40%
D. 6个月≤T<1年,6个月整存整取,支取日基准利率上浮40%
E. T=1年,1年整存整取,支取日基准利率上浮40%
F. T>1年,1年整存整取,1年的部分按开户日基准利率上浮40%,超过1年的部分按支取日挂牌公告的活期储蓄存款利率
【多选题】
柜员为客户办理销户业务,下列哪项说法是正确的___
A. 客户必须提供有效身份证件
B. 柜员需审核存单关键信息是否完整、存单是否真实有效
C. 存款日期大于1天且小于7天,通知日期为销户当日的前一天
D. 存款日期大于等于七天且小于3个月,则通知日期为销户当日的七天前
【多选题】
以下可以代理办理的业务是___
A. 金利保
B. 短信开通
C. 手机银行
D. 定存冠
E. 金兰保
【多选题】
“金利保”的适用利率档级有___
A. 1天通知存款
B. 7天通知存款
C. 3个月整存整取
D. 6个月整存整取
【多选题】
关于金利保说法正确的有___
A. “金利保”是一款1年期的人民币个人定期存款产品
B. “金利保”单笔起存点为1万元,按照1万整数倍数递增
C. 金兰保支持全额提前支取,不支持部分提前支取,靠档计息;到期不自动转存
D. 某客户从2016年7月1日存入金利保,于2016年7月5日销户,该执行利为支取日当天的央行一天通知存款利率上浮25%
【多选题】
以下产品的开立哪个无需事先拥有我行个人活期账户(存折或银行卡)___
A. 金利保
B. 定存冠
C. 金兰保
D. 活期冠
【多选题】
目前定存冠的存期为___
A. 360天
B. 365天
C. 380天
D. 780天
【多选题】
定存冠提前支取的计息方法为___
A. 应付利息=持有存单本金×起息日(含)至提前支取日(含)实际天数×靠档利率÷360
B. 应付利息=持有存单本金×起息日(含)至提前支取日(含)实际天数×靠档利率÷365
C. 应付利息=持有存单本金×起息日(含)至提前支取日(不含)实际天数×靠档利率÷360
D. 应付利息=持有存单本金×起息日(含)至提前支取日(不含)实际天数×靠档利率÷365
【多选题】
定存冠存单挂失业务___书面挂失、书面解挂、挂失新开;( )口头挂失、电话挂失。
A. 不支持;不支持
B. 支持;支持
C. 支持;不支持
D. 不支持;支持
【多选题】
定存冠8号、9号、10号、11号产品的认购金额起点分别为___
A. 1万、1万、5万、10万
B. 1万、1万、5万、5万
C. 5万、5万、10万、10万
D. 2万、2万、5万、10万
【多选题】
“定存冠”产品,___,到期后 ( )。如逾期支取,逾期天数按支取日我行对外挂牌公告的活期利率计息。
A. 支持部分提前支取, 自动转存
B. 不支持部分提前支取,不自动转存
C. 支持部分提前支取,不自动转存
D. 不支持部分提前支取,自动转存
【多选题】
定存冠挂失办理网点为___
A. 任一网点
B. 定存冠办理网点
C. 借记卡办理网点
D. 以上说法都不正确
【多选题】
“定存冠”客户开户或销户申请都可委托代理人办理,代理人办理时须提供___,并按照我行相关业务管理规定执行。
A. 代理人有效身份证件
B. 被代理人有效身份证件
C. 代理人、被代理人有效身份证件
D. 被代理人有效身份证件、书面授权书
【多选题】
定存冠的最低认购起点金额是___万元。
A. 2
B. 3
C. 5
D. 1
【多选题】
对“定存冠"的描述正确的为___
A. 开户交易完成后,系统自动从申请人账户内扣除申请金额
B. 销户交易完成后其本金与利息会自动划转到原开户时存款转出的银行账户内
C. “定存冠”产品支持部分提前支取,到期后不自动转存
D. “定存冠”存单可以办理质押,根据我行相关定期存单质押的有关规定办理,质押期限不得大于存单到期日
【多选题】
办理以下定期存款业务需要出示本行银行卡或存折的为___
A. 金利保
B. 金兰保
C. 核心版“定存冠"
D. 整存整取
推荐试题
【单选题】
量变中的阶段性部分质变表现了___
A. 事物内部各部分之间变化的不平衡性
B. 事物整体与某些构成部分之间变化的不平衡性
C. 事物与事物之间变化的不平衡性
D. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化的不平衡性
【单选题】
量变中的局部性部分质变是___
A. 事物的本质属性与非本质属性之间变化不平衡性的表现
B. 事物的各个部分之间变化不平衡性的表现
C. 事物的内部矛盾和外部条件变化不平衡性的表现
D. 事物的量和质变化不平衡性的表现
【单选题】
揭示事物发展的趋势和道路的规律是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展规律
【单选题】
“肯定和否定相互渗透,在一定意义上,肯定就是否定。”这是一种___
A. 相对主义诡辩论的观点
B. 唯物辩证法的观点
C. 主观唯心主义的观点
D. 形而上学的观点
【单选题】
事物的否定方面是指___
A. 事物的积极方面
B. 事物的消极方面
C. 事物中维持其存在的方面
D. 事物中促使其灭亡的方面
【单选题】
作为辩证的否定的“扬弃”是___
A. 既保留又继承
B. 彻底抛弃
C. 既克服又保留
D. 矛盾的调和
【单选题】
辩证的否定是事物发展的环节,因为辩证的否定___
A. 把旧事物完全抛弃
B. 使旧事物发生量变
C. 是新事物产生、旧事物灭亡
D. 是从外部强加给事物的
【单选题】
否定之否定规律___
A. 在事物完成一个发展周期时才能完整地表现出来
B. 在事物发展过程中任何一点上都可以表现出来
C. 在事物经过量变和质变两种状态后表现出来
D. 在事物发展过程中经过肯定和否定两个阶段表现出来
【单选题】
事物发展的周期性体现了___
A. 事物发展的直线性与曲折性的统一
B. 事物发展是一个不断地回到出发点的运动
C. 事物发展的周而复始的循环性
D. 事物发展的前进性和曲折性的统一
【单选题】
直线论的错误在于只看到___
A. 事物发展的周期性而否认了前进性
B. 事物发展的前进性而否认了曲折性
C. 事物发展的间接性而否认了连续性
D. 事物发展的曲折性而否认了周期性
【单选题】
循环论的错误在于___
A. 只看到事物发展的普遍性,没有看到事物发展过程的特殊性
B. 只看到事物的绝对运动,没有看到事物的相对静止
C. 只看到事物发展道路的曲折性,没有看到事物发展趋势的前进性
D. 只看到新旧事物之间的连续性,没有看到新旧事物之间的间断性
【单选题】
对立统一规律揭示了___
A. 事物发展的动力和源泉
B. 事物发展的状态和过程
C. 事物发展的方向和道路
D. 事物发展的两种趋向
【单选题】
唯物辩证法的实质和核心是___
A. 对立统一规律
B. 质量互变规律
C. 否定之否定规律
D. 联系和发展的规律
【单选题】
辩证法所说的矛盾是指___
A. 人们思维中的前后不一的自相矛盾
B. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的对立统一
C. 对立面之间的相互排斥
D. 事物之间或事物内部各要素之间的相互依赖
【单选题】
矛盾的基本属性是___
A. 普遍性和特殊性
B. 绝对性和相对性
C. 变动性和稳定性
D. 斗争性和同一性
【单选题】
依据是___
A. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性辩证关系的原理
B. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性辩证关系的原理
C. 事物发展的量变和质变辩证关系的原理
D. 事物发展的内因和外因辩证关系的原理
【单选题】
矛盾问题的精髓是___
A. 矛盾的普遍性和特殊性关系的问题
B. 矛盾的同一性和斗争性关系的问题
C. 主要矛盾和次要矛盾关系的问题
D. 矛盾的主要方面和次要方面关系的问题
【单选题】
题的方法都是___
A. 重点论
B. 均衡论
C. 一点论
D. 两点论
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
现代人才素质的灵魂是___。
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基础.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
A. 德育
B. 智育
C. 体育
D. 美育
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基本内容
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一