【填空题】
4、分布最广的根管类型是___
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
答案
单管型
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【填空题】
5、下颌隆突表面从前向后排列着___、___和___
【填空题】
6、在面深区内,从翼外肌两头之间穿出的三叉神经分支是___
【填空题】
7、当研磨食物后期阶段,下颌接近牙尖交错合时,其生物力学杠杆___同时存在。
【简答题】
四、简答题 1、试述牙龈出血的主要原因。
【简答题】
2,简述氟化物防龋的方法和机制。【这个重题太多了,现在基本不考大题了】
【简答题】
简述舍格伦综合征的临床病理特征。
【简答题】
简述肯氏I、Ⅱ类游离缺牙,可摘局部义齿修复如何考虑保护末端基牙。/肯氏1类如何减轻游离端基牙损伤。(2011年简答)【同时参考真题答案总结的参考答案】
【单选题】
经济物品是指___
A. 有用的物品
B. 需要花钱购买的物品
C. 稀缺的物品
D. 有用的且稀缺的物品
【单选题】
下列不属于经济物品的是___
A. 自来水
B. 海水
C. 蒸馏水
D. 瓶装矿泉水
【单选题】
下列属于微观经济学考察的问题是___
A. 失业率上升或下降
B. 各行各业的雇佣工人数量
C. 某厂商的产量水平
D. 降低关税后对外贸的影响
【单选题】
下列不属于宏观经济学考察的问题是___
A. 政府向某厂商征收污染税
B. 政府实施产业结构调整政策
C. 政府调整交通运输、邮电部门的收费
D. 政府提高关税税率
【单选题】
经济学中说“资源是稀缺的”是指___
A. 世界上大多数人生活在贫困中
B. 相对于资源的需求而言,资源总是不足的
C. 资源必须保留给下一代
D. 世界上资源最终将由于生产更多的物品和劳务而消耗光
【单选题】
价格上升引起销售收入减少的商品是因为其需求___
A. 缺乏弹性
B. 单位弹性
C. 富有弹性
D. 完全有弹性
【单选题】
某人的收入减少后,对某商品的需求反而增加,该商品是___
A. 低档品
B. 互补品
C. 替代品
D. 高档品
【单选题】
均衡价格是指___
A. 需求价格与供给价格相一致时的价格
B. 需求曲线与供给曲线相交所决定的价格
C. 固定不变的价格
D. A、B都是
【单选题】
供给量减少表现为___
A. 供给曲线向右移动
B. 供给曲线向左移动
C. 沿着供给曲线向右上方移动
D. 沿着供给曲线向左下方移动
【单选题】
假定其他条件不变,由于商品本身价格变动引起的商品购买量的变动叫___
A. 需求量的变动
B. 需求的变动
C. 供给量的变动
D. 供给的变动
【单选题】
如果某种商品的价格上升会引起另一种商品的需求量减少,这两种商品是___
A. 替代品
B. 互补品
C. 低档品
D. 正常品
【单选题】
商品本身价格不变,由于其他因素变动引起的商品购买量的变动叫___
A. 需求的变动
B. 需求量的变动
C. 供给的变动
D. 供给量的变动
【单选题】
下列商品中,最适宜采用“薄利多销”的办法来增加销售收入的商品是___
A. 厨房用具
B. 家用电器
C. 药品
D. 食品
【单选题】
某消费者收入下降,导致他对某商品的需求也相应减少,说明该商品是___
A. 低档品
B. 替代品
C. 互补品
D. 正常物品
【单选题】
市场上某产品存在超额需求是由于___
A. 产品价格超出均衡价格
B. 产品是优质品
C. 产品是供不应求的商品
D. 产品价格低于均衡价格
【单选题】
如果一个消费者所选择的商品的边际效用都递减了,说明:___
A. 这个消费者的收入没有增加
B. 这个消费者的生活状况恶化了
C. 这个消费者减少了各种商品的消费
D. 这个消费者的生活水平提高了
【单选题】
处在不同的无差异曲线上的各种商品组合:___
A. 效用是不可能相等的
B. 一般情况下,效用是不可能相等的的,但在个别场合有可能相等
C. 效用是否相等或不相等要视情况二定
D. 效用是可能相等的
【单选题】
无差异曲线的斜率是负数,其经济意义是:___
A. 两种商品的关系是补充关系
B. 两种商品的关系是互不相关的
C. 两种商品的关系是替代的关系
D. 两种商品的关系既不是补充,又不是替代的关系
【单选题】
一个消费者的效用最大化是指___
A. 在收入制约条件下的效用最大化
B. 用最少的支出,取得最大的效用
C. 用尽可能多的收入来保证一定量程度的满足
D. 尽可能多地取得各种商品
【单选题】
如果预算线平行移动,可能的原因是___
A. 消费者购买的其中一种商品的价格发生变化
B. 消费者购买的两种商品的价格发生不同比例的变化
C. 消费者购买的两种商品的价格发生同比例、同方向的变化
D. 消费者购买的两种商品的价格发生同比例、但不同方向的变化
【单选题】
根据无差异曲线与预算线相结合的分析,消费者均衡实现于___
A. 无差异曲线与预算线的相切点
B. 无差异曲线与预算线的相交点
C. 离远点最远的无差异曲线上的任何一点
D. 离远点最远的预算线上的任何一点
【单选题】
消费者剩余是消费者___
A. 获得的总效用
B. 愿意支付的价格与实际支付价格之间的差额
C. 消费不了的商品
D. 剩余的货币
【单选题】
如果连续地增加某种生产要素,在总产量达到最大时,边际产量曲线将___
A. 与纵轴相交
B. 经过原点
C. 与平均产量曲线相交
D. 与横轴相交
【单选题】
会计成本忽略了厂商的___
A. 可变成本
B. 沉没成本
C. 机会成本
D. 收益
【单选题】
生产者行为理论要说明的问题是___
A. 追求利润最大化的生产者必将以最优生产要素组合进行生产
B. 追求利润最大化的生产者必将以最高价格进行生产
C. 追求产量最大化的厂商必将以最大产量进行生产
D. 追求成本最小化的厂商必将以最低成本进行生产
【单选题】
边际成本曲线向右上方倾斜的原因是___
A. 边际技术替代率递减规律在起作用
B. 边际效用递减规律在起作用
C. 边际收益递减规律在起作用
D. 规模收益递增规律在起作用
【单选题】
根据等产量曲线与等成本曲线相结合的分析,两种生产要素的最优组合是___
A. 等产量曲线与等成本线相交之点
B. 等产量曲线与等成本线相切之点
C. 离原点最远的等产量曲线上的任何一点
D. 离原点最近的等产量曲线上的任何一点
【单选题】
相对短期供给曲线,厂商的长期供给曲线___
A. 更缺乏弹性
B. 新颖性较小
C. 垂直
D. 更富有弹性
【单选题】
等产量线上某一点的切线的斜率等于___
A. 边际替代率
B. 等成本线的斜率
C. 边际技术替代率
D. 预算线的斜率
【单选题】
规模报酬递减是在下述哪种情况下发生的___
A. 按比例连续增加各种生产要素
B. 不按比例连续增加各种生产要素
C. 连续的投入某种生产要素而保持其他生产要素不变
D. 上述都正确
【单选题】
在下列各项中,不属于生产要素的是___
A. 农民拥有的土地
B. 企业家才能
C. 在柜台上销售的产品——服装
D. 煤矿工人采煤时所付出的低廉劳动
【单选题】
完全竞争市场实现长期均衡的条件是___
A. 边际收益、平均收益、长期平均成本与长期边际成本都相等
B. 长期边际成本与长期平均成本相等
C. 平均收益与长期边际成本相等
D. 平均收益与长期平均成本相等
【单选题】
在完全竞争市场,如果某行业的厂商的商品价格等于平均成本时,那么___
A. 有些新厂商进入该行业
B. 有些老厂商退出该行业
C. 既有新厂商进入,又有老厂商退出
D. 既没有新厂商进入,又没有老厂商退出
推荐试题
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
现代人才素质的灵魂是___。
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基础.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
A. 德育
B. 智育
C. 体育
D. 美育
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基本内容
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
___是人才素质的综合体现.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
【单选题】
社会主义社会人生价值标准是___
A. 是否拥有金钱财富
B. 自我价值实现的程度
C. 宗教信仰是否虔诚
D. 是否为人民群众尽心尽力服务
【单选题】
回答人为什么活着___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
表明人应当怎样对待生活___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
判别什么样的人生才有意义___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 价值取向
【单选题】
下列人生态度中正确的是___
A. 认真务实
B. 看破红尘
C. 悲观消沉
D. 满足于现状
【单选题】
下列属于正确的人生目的的是___
A. 追求享乐
B. 为人民服务
C. 追求金钱
D. 追求个人利益
【单选题】
___认为,金钱可以主宰一切.
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___ 认为,社会和他人是达到个人目的的手段。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___认为,人生的全部内容就在于满足感官的需求与快乐。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
马克思对于人的本质的论断确立与___
A. 《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》
B. 《共产党宣言》
C. 《劳动在才从猿到人转变过程中的作用》D《论黑格尔哲学》
【单选题】
人与自然关系的实质是___
A. 人与人的关系,是社会关系
B. 人对于自然的利用和占有
C. 自然必须服务于人类社会的发展
D. 人与物的占有与被占有的关系
【单选题】
在社会交往和公共生活中公民应该遵守的道德准则是___
A. 职业道德
B. 道德
C. 社会公德
D. 家庭美德
【单选题】
社会公德最基本的要求是___
A. 文明礼貌
B. 遵纪守法
C. 保护环境
D. 助人为乐
【单选题】
通过其规定和实施,影响人们思想,培养和提高人们法律意识,引导人们依法行为的作用是法律的___
A. 指引作用
B. 预测作用
C. 评价作用
D. 教育作用
【单选题】
有序的公共生活是构建和谐社会的___
A. 重要条件
B. 重要作用
C. 重要标志
D. 重要原则
【单选题】
一行人在过路口时迎面遇到红灯,看到近处没有车辆便径直通过。他这样做是___
A. 节省时间之举
B. 聪明灵活之举
C. 可供学习之举
D. 不遵守交通规则,违反社会公德之举
【单选题】
任何一个社会成员,无论具有何种身份、职业和地位,都必须在公共生活中遵守社会公德。这体现了社会公德具有的___特点。
A. 继承性
B. 基础性
C. 广泛性
D. 简明性