【多选题】
67:个人睡眠户治理目的___
A. 为进一步加强账户风险管理,
B. 防范账户资金盗用、挪用风险。
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题

答案
AB
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【多选题】
68:个人睡眠账户治理的依据___
A. 《中华人民共和国反洗钱法》
B. 《中国人民银行关于加强支付结算管理防范电信网络新型违法犯罪有关事项的通知》
C. 个人存款账户实名制规定
【多选题】
69:本行反洗钱系统中,属于编辑岗人员职责的是:___
A. 二次交易补录、客户信息补录、错误回执补录;
B. 尽职调查客户信息,客户风险等级人工初评;
C. 分析上报或排除可疑案例
D. 手工上报大额交易、可疑交易
E. 客户风险等级人工审核
【多选题】
70:法定代表人、负责人等关键岗位人员, 以及客户本人或其账户控制人、受益人属于___的单位的客户,可评定为高风险客户。
A. 外国政要
B. 被政府及相关部门列入“黑名单”的客户
C. 被怀疑其经营活动或资金来源合法性的客户
D. 已经或正在接受行政或司法调查的客户
E. 有犯罪嫌疑或其他犯罪记录的客户
【多选题】
71:符合下列哪个条件的个人和单位客户,可评定为低风险客户___
A. 外国政要
B. 党的机关、国家权力机关、行政机关、司法机关、政协机关、解放军、武警部队,但不包括其下属的各类企事业单位
C. 同业金融机构
D. 非盈利社会事业单位,如公立学校、公立医院
E. 上市公司
【多选题】
72:自然人客户的客户身份信息“九要素”包括___。
A. 客户的姓名、性别、国籍
B. 职业、住所地或者工作单位地址
C. 联系方式
D. 身份证件或者身份证明文件的种类、号码和有效期限
E. 工作单位
【多选题】
73:涉及恐怖活动的资产被采取冻结措施期间,符合以下情形之一的,有关账户可以进行款项收取或者资产受让___
A. 收取被采取冻结措施的资产产生的孳息以及其他收益
B. 受偿债权
C. 为不影响正常的证券、期货交易秩序,执行恐怖活动组织及恐怖活动人员名单公布前生效的交易指令
D. 执行恐怖活动组织及恐怖活动人员名单公布后的交易指令
【多选题】
74:根据〈金融机构大额交易和可疑交易报告管理办法〉(中国人民银行令〔2016〕第3号)的规定,符合下列___的大额交易应当通过反洗钱系统提交大额交易报告。
A. 当日单笔或者累计人民币交易5万元以上(含5万元)、外币等值1万美元以上(含1万美元)的现金缴存、现金支取、现金结售汇、现钞兑换、现金汇款、现金票据解付及其他形式的现金收支。
B. 非自然人客户银行账户与其他的银行账户发生当日单笔或者累计交易人民币200万元以上(含200万元)、外币等值20万美元以上(含20万美元)的款项划转。
C. 自然人客户银行账户与其他的银行账户之间发生当日单笔或者累计交易人民币50万元以上(含50万)、外币等值10万美元以上(含10万美元)的境内款项划转。
D. 自然人客户银行账户与其他的银行账户之间发生当日单笔或者累计交易人民币20万元以上(含20万)、外币等值1万美元以上(含1万美元)的跨境款项划转。
E. 非自然人客户银行账户与其他的银行账户发生当日单笔或者累计交易人民币100万元以上(含100万元)、外币等值10万美元以上(含10万美元)的款项划转。
【多选题】
75:对符合下列___条件的大额交易,如未发现该交易或行为可疑的,可以不报告大额交易报告。
A. 定期存款到期后,不直接提取或者划转,而是本金或者本金加全部或者部分利息续存入在同一机构开立的同一户名下的另一账户。
B. 自然人实盘外汇买卖交易过程中不同外币币种间的转换。
C. 交易一方为各级党的机关、国家权力机关、行政机关、司法机关、军事机关、人民政协机关和人民解放军、武警部队,但不包含其下属的各类企事业单位。
D. 各机构在黄金交易所进行的黄金交易
E. 证券公司、期货公司、基金管理公司与客户进行金融交易并通过本行账户划转款项的
【多选题】
76:本行对通过交易监测标准筛选出的交易进行人工分析、识别,并记录分析过程,不作为可疑交易报告的,应当记录分析排除的合理理由,包括但不限于___
A. 客户的身份、客户的职业(行业)
B. 客户的年龄
C. 经营范围
D. 交易目的
E. 交易对手情况
【多选题】
77:出现以下___情况时,本行各营业机构应当重新识别客户。
A. 客户提出销户
B. 客户行为或者交易情况出现异常的
C. 客户姓名或者名称与国务院有关部门、机构和司法机关依法要求金融机构协查或者关注的犯罪嫌疑人、洗钱和恐怖融资分子的姓名或者名称相同的
D. 客户有洗钱、恐怖融资活动嫌疑的
E. 先前获得的客户身份资料的真实性、有效性、完整性存在疑点的
【多选题】
78:在按照规定进行识别或者重新识别客户身份信息时,除核对有效身份证件或者其他身份证明文件外,可采取以下的一种或几种措施,识别或者重新识别客户身份___
A. 回访客户
B. 实地查访
C. 向公安、工商行政管理等部门核实
D. 其他可依法采取的措施
【多选题】
79:当有关单位或个人提出查询可疑交易的要求时,本行应当按照《中华人民共和国反洗钱法》的规定,审核对方的查询权限。对于符合规定查询要求的,应在专门的查询登记簿中登记___。
A. 查询人的查询事项
B. 查询人的姓名
C. 查询人的证件号码
D. 查询的法律依据
【多选题】
80:关于银行反洗钱培训对象的说法以下正确的是___。
A. 培训对象应包括高级管理层
B. 只有反洗钱岗位的人员才需要培训
C. 培训对象应不包括高级管理层
D. 反洗钱培训应针对不同对象提供培训
E. 新入行员工属于培训的对象
【多选题】
81:客户要求变更有关信息的,应重新识别客户身份,有关信息包括___
A. 姓名或者名称
B. 身份证件或者身份证明文件种类
C. 身份证件号码
D. 注册资本
E. 法定代表人
【多选题】
83:银行柜员发现客户身份证件或身份证明文件已经过期,应___。
A. 立刻终止与客户的业务关系
B. 通知客户更新身份资料
C. 如果客户没有在合理期限内更新且没有提出合理理由的,中止办理新业务
D. 完整留存通知客户更新资料的工作记录
【多选题】
84:应履行客户身份识别义务的一次性金融服务是指为不在本行开立账户的客户提供符合以下哪些条件的现金汇款、现钞兑换、票据兑付等一次性金融服务___
A. 交易金额单笔人民币1万元以上
B. 交易金额单笔人民币10万元以上
C. 交易金额单笔外汇等值1000美元以上
D. 交易金额单笔外汇等值10000美元以上
【多选题】
85:本行各营业机构在以开立账户等方式与客户建立业务关系或客户为他人提供交易金额单笔人民币1万元以上或外币等值1000美元以上的现金汇款(含无卡、无折存现业务)、现钞兑换、票据兑付等一次性金融服务时,应通过以联网核查为主的方式___。
A. 核对、登记客户身份证件或其他身份证明文件并留存复印件
B. 登记客户身份证件或其他身份证明文件并留存复印件
C. 登记客户联系方式
D. 无需登记客户联系方式
【多选题】
86:本行反洗钱机构及人员设置,采用“___架构下‘上层重视、中层执行、基层落实、全员参与’”模式。
A. 总行领导
B. 支行实施、分理处联动
C. 支行联动、分理处实施
D. 支行联动及实施
【多选题】
87:当自然人客户由他人代理办理人民币单笔5万元(含)以上或者外币等值1万元美元(含)以上的现金取款及转账业务时,各营业机构应___。
A. 核对本人和代理人身份证件
B. 核对代理人身份证件
C. 摘录代理人身份证号码
D. 登记代理人联系方式并留存本人和代理人的有效身份证件复印件
E. 登记代理人联系方式并留存代理人的有效身份证件复印件
【多选题】
89:本行反洗钱业务受到监管处罚时,由内部核算单位承担罚款,在当期考核利润额中调减,同时以监管机构“双罚”金额合并计算后总金额的10%为基数,责任人员分别按以下标准挂钩:___。
A. 总行反洗钱工作领导小组10%
B. 总行反洗钱工作领导小组20%
C. 涉及处罚的支行反洗钱工作实施小组30%
D. 涉及处罚的分理处反洗钱工作联动小组(含支行营业部)50%
E. 涉及处罚的分理处反洗钱工作联动小组(含支行营业部)60%
【多选题】
90:根据反洗钱客户身份识别要求,本行在新开立对公账户时,要求通过询问、要求客户提供开户资、查询公开信息等方式获取核对客户的受益所有人信息,以下收集并保存的有关识别受益所有人资料正确的有___。
A. XX股份有限公司的《非自然人客户受益所有人信息登记表》
B. XX股份有限公司的公司章程及《非自然人客户受益所有人信息登记表》
C. 个体户张三的《非自然人客户受益所有人信息登记表》
D. 个体户张三的公司章程及《非自然人客户受益所有人信息登记表》
E. XX合伙企业的公司章程
【多选题】
91:有下列情形之一的,银行有权拒绝开户:___
A. 对单位和个人身份信息存在疑义,要求出示辅助证件,单位和个人拒绝出示的
B. 单位和个人组织他人同时或者分批开立账户的
C. 有明显理由怀疑开立账户从事违法犯罪活动的
D. 单位出示银行要求的开户资料的
【多选题】
94:新反洗钱系统,不同风险等级客户的“回头看”频率分别为:___
A. 高风险客户至少应该每半年进行一次持续评级
B. 较高风险客户至少应该9个月进行一次持续评级
C. 一般风险客户至少应该18个月进行一次持续评级
D. 较低风险客户至少应该24个月进行一次持续评级
E. 低风险客户至少应该30个月进行一次持续评级
F. 较高风险客户至少应该每年进行一次持续评级
【单选题】
在改革开放中,经过三次思想解放,我们先后冲破了“个人崇拜”、“计划经济崇拜”和“所有制崇拜”,其中冲破“计划经济崇拜”的关键事件是___
A. 中共十五大
B. 中共十二大
C. 中共十三大
D. 中共十四大
【单选题】
习近平强调,___。我们要坚持把人民对美好生活的向往作为我们的奋斗目标,始终为人民不懈奋斗、同人民一起奋斗,形成竞相奋斗、团结奋斗的生动局面。
A. 新时代是创业者的时代
B. 新时代是奋斗者的时代
C. 新时代是职业者的时代
D. 新时代是科学家的时代
【单选题】
中共中央办公厅印发《关于解决形式主义突出问题为基层减负的通知》,决定将2019年作为___。
A. 基层工作减压年
B. 基层干部减负年
C. 基层减负
D. 基层工作减负年
【单选题】
第7期《求是》杂志发表习近平的重要文章《关于坚持和发展中国特色社会主义的几个问题》。文章强调,___问题是关系党的事业兴衰成败第一位的问题。
A. 政治
B. 道路
C. 思想
D. 作风
【单选题】
2019年4月30日,习近平出席纪念五四运动100周年大会并发表重要讲话。他指出,五四运动孕育了以___为主要内容的伟大五四精神。
A. 爱国、进步、民主、科学
B. 爱国、进步、文明、发展
C. 团结、奋进、民主、科学
D. 团结、奋进、文明、发展
【单选题】
5月12日是汶川地震11周年,时光虽逝,伤痕难愈,大地震带给我们诸多思考。经国务院批准,自2009年起,每年5月12日为全国___
A. 防灾减灾日
B. 地震预警日
C. 国家哀悼日
D. 感恩日
【单选题】
6月16日出版的第12期《求是》杂志发表习近平的重要文章《坚定文化自信,建设社会主义文化强国》。文章指出,___是更基础、更广泛、更深厚的自信,是更基本、更深沉、更持久的力量。
A. 文化自信
B. 道路自信
C. 制度自信
D. 理论自信
【单选题】
中共中央对外联络部6月27日在___举办“(C)”主题宣讲会。这是党的十八大以来首次向外国政党宣讲中国共产党开展党内集中教育情况。
A. 上海浦东、不忘初心,牢记使命
B. 山东威海、中国共产党砥砺前行70年
C. 河南郑州、中国共产党的初心和使命
D. 浙江杭州、不忘初心,牢记使命
【单选题】
2019年7月23日,全国政协在京召开___专题协商会,会议强调,加强农村基本公共文化服务建设,是实施乡村振兴战略和建设社会主义精神文明的重要内容,是社会主义制度优越性的集中体现。
A. “加强农村基础文化服务建设”
B. “加强和改善农村公共文化服务”
C. “提升农村基本公共文化服务水平”
D. “加强农村基本公共文化服务建设”
【单选题】
坚决打赢脱贫攻坚战,确保到___我国现行标准下农村贫困人口实现脱贫,让贫困人口和贫困地区同全国一道进入全面小康社会,是我们党的庄严承诺。
A. 2020年
B. 2021年
C. 2025年
D. 2030年
推荐试题
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观