【单选题】
胃液分析的结果与胃癌患者不符的是___
A. 高峰胃酸排泌量降低
B. 游离酸缺乏
C. 胃液呈血性
D. 隐血试验强阳性
E. 总酸度增高
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题
答案
E
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【单选题】
急性出血坏死型胰腺炎所发生的休克属于___
A. 疼痛性休克
B. 感染性休克
C. 低血容量性休克
D. 心源性休克
E. 过敏性休克
【单选题】
上消化道出血,其正确的是___
A. 主要表现是腹痛和腹泻
B. 出血量5ml以上,呈柏油色
C. 最主要原因由肝硬化引起
D. 呕血定有黑便,黑便不一定有呕血
E. 黄色粪便可排除消化道出血
【单选题】
急性化脓性胃炎和其他胃炎区别的主要特征是___
A. 上腹剧痛
B. 寒战高热
C. 频繁呕吐
D. 消化不良
E. 全身化脓
【单选题】
难治性肝硬化腹水的最佳治疗措施是___
A. 口服导泻剂
B. 应用甘露醇
C. 定期输注血浆
D. 腹水浓缩回输
E. 腹腔穿刺放液
【单选题】
急性腹泻患者一般不会出现的护理诊断是___
A. 舒适的改变
B. 体液过多
C. 腹泻
D. 体液不足
E. 活动无耐力
【单选题】
胃是消化道中最膨大的部位,成人的胃一般可容纳食物___
A. 0.5~1.5L
B. 1~2L
C. 2~3L
D. 3~4L
E. 4~6L
【单选题】
肝性脑病患者以下哪种情况应慎用谷氨酸钾___
A. 腹水
B. 肝性脑病晚期
C. 功能性肾衰竭
D. 伴继发感染
E. 稀释性低钠血症
【单选题】
急性单纯性胃炎的主要病因___
A. 细菌或其毒素
B. 激素
C. 饮烈酒和咖啡
D. 进过冷或过热食物
E. 暴饮暴食
【单选题】
肝硬化患者血清免疫球蛋白增高最明显的是___
A. IgA
B. IgG
C. IgE
D. IgD
E. IgM
【单选题】
下列哪种疾病门静脉高压最显著___
A. 酒精性肝硬化
B. 肝炎后肝硬化
C. 血吸虫病性肝硬化
D. 心源性肝硬化
E. 胆汁性肝硬化
【单选题】
肝肾综合征患者的特征性表现是___
A. 自发性少尿或无尿
B. 肝昏迷
C. 肾脏病理改变明显
D. 氮质血症不显
E. 肾功能减退
【单选题】
治疗肝性脑病减少肠内有毒物质产生和吸收的措施不包括___
A. 使用降氨药物
B. 禁蛋白质摄入
C. 口服新霉素
D. 口服乳果糖导泻
E. 弱酸性溶液灌肠
【单选题】
肝性脑病的用药护理,其错误的是___
A. 降氨药物滴速不宜过快
B. 乳果糖应从小剂量开始服用
C. 脑水肿时用甘露醇
D. 对少尿者宜用谷氨酸钾
E. 精氨酸不宜与碱性药物配伍
【单选题】
下述哪一个法的特征体现了在法律面前人人平等___
A. 稳定性
B. 公正性
C. 社会共同性
D. 倡导性
E. 强制性
【单选题】
下列哪一项是法的功能的概括___
A. 维护社会共同生活
B. 建立社会共同生活
C. 巩固政权的统治
D. 维护公民的基本权益
E. 社会关系的调节器
【单选题】
当患者对护士主诉病情时,护士没有认真听而延误了抢救时机,引起死亡,符合下列哪项___
A. 犯罪
B. 赔礼
C. 道歉
D. 置之不理
E. 冷漠
【单选题】
医生开出10%KCl10ml静脉推注的错误医嘱,而护士却按医嘱执行,结果造成患者死亡.那么,即便该护士纯属机械执行医嘱,也应受到什么处理___
A. 赔礼
B. 道歉
C. 法律责任
D. 不负责人
E. 教育
【单选题】
当患者对护士主诉病情时,护士没有认真听,引起患者的不满,这就是侵犯了患者的生命健康权,通过下列哪项方式解决___
A. 置之不理
B. 赔礼.道歉
C. 诈辩
D. 敷衍了事
E. 怠慢
【单选题】
护理与法的主要特征表现有几点___
A. 0.1
B. 0.2
C. 0.3
D. 0.4
E. 0.5
【单选题】
我国卫生部正式颁布了《中华人民共和国护士管理方法》时间是___
A. 1994年1月1日
B. 1997年1月1日
C. 2000年1月1日
D. 1979年1月1日
E. 2001/1/1
【单选题】
急性肾衰竭患者,发病后15天,每天尿量达5000ml,每天补液量应是___
A. 相当于每天排出水分量的1/3~1/2
B. 等于每天排出水分量加生理需要量
C. 相当于每天排出水分量的2倍
D. 每天补液量为2500~3500ml
E. 不补液.仅随意口服液体
【单选题】
属于肾前性肾衰竭的病因是___
A. 严重休克
B. 应用氨基糖苷类药物
C. 盆腔肿瘤压迫输尿管
D. 毒蛇咬伤
E. 肾小球肾炎
【单选题】
急性肾衰竭少尿期电解质紊乱,下列哪一项是正确的___
A. 高钾血症.高磷血症.高镁血症.低钠血症.低钙血症
B. 高钾血症.高钠血症.高镁血症.低磷血症.低钙血症
C. 低钾血症.高磷血症.高镁血症.低钠血症.低钙血症
D. 高钾血症.高磷血症.低镁血症.低钠血症.低钙血症
E. 高钾血症.低镁血症.高钠血症.低磷血症.低钙血症
【单选题】
低效性呼吸状态与下列哪一项有关___
A. 全身抵抗力下降
B. 肺不张,支气管分泌物增多,肺水肿
C. 尿量减少,全身水肿
D. 肺泡毛细血管内膜损伤,透明膜形成
E. 中心静脉压升高
【单选题】
患者,男性,20岁,失血性休克30小时,经抢救血压恢复正常,发病以来尿量仅为400ml,为确诊是否肾衰竭,最适宜的检查是___
A. 血液pH测定
B. 电解质检查
C. 尿液检查
D. 肾盂造影
E. 补液试验
【单选题】
患者男性,急性胰腺炎并发肾功能衰竭,欲行血液透析,下列属于血液透析禁忌证的是___
A. 清尿素氮BUN>30mmoL/L
B. 清钾>6.5mmol/L
C. 清肌酐>908μmol/L
D. 重酸中毒或碱中毒
E. 克
【单选题】
急性肾功能衰竭少尿期,叙述不正确的是___
A. 尿钠浓度>40mmol/L
B. 尿比重>1.010
C. 肾小管上皮细胞管型
D. 血钾浓度直线上升
E. 补液后尿量不增加
【单选题】
患者误输异型血后无尿3天,无休克,下列最有效的治疗是___
A. 输注地塞米松
B. 输注速尿
C. 输注碳酸氢钠
D. 输注甘露醇
E. 血液透析
【单选题】
患者女性,38岁,因骨盆骨折,肝破裂,失血性休克入院。治疗中出现呼吸加快,呼吸窘迫,口唇发绀,双肺闻及湿啰音,Pa02<8.0kPa。有效处理为___
A. 高浓度口罩吸氧
B. 呼气终末负压通气
C. 人工呼吸
D. 使用呼吸兴奋剂
E. 呼气终末正压通气
【单选题】
患者男性,创伤后休克25小时,经抢救后血压恢复正常,但一直未排尿液,膀胱不充盈,导尿导出尿液100ml。为确定是否为急性肾衰竭,可行下列哪一项检查___
A. 中心静脉压测定
B. PSP试验
C. 血常规
D. 尿钠测定
E. 血细胞比容
【单选题】
患者男性,40岁,矿工,因在坑道工作时塌方,被埋6小时后获救,双股部及臀部明显肿胀,血清钾5.5mmol/L,诊断为挤压伤。为观察有无肾脏并发症,下列哪一项最有意义___
A. 血压.脉率
B. 出血.感染
C. 中心静脉压
D. 尿量.尿钠
E. 瞳孔.神志
【单选题】
出血性休克患者,经手术止血并补充血容量纠正休克,伤后24小时一直无尿,使用速尿无效。以后补液方案应是___
A. 随意口服液体
B. 每天经静脉途径给予2000~2500ml液体
C. 4天内不补充液体
D. 不补液,仅口服山梨醇导泻
E. 按显性失水+不显性失水-内生水公式补液
【单选题】
弥散性血管内凝血最早的临床表现是___
A. 取血时不易抽出.血易凝
B. 皮肤粘膜下出血
C. 注射部位易出血
D. 伤口易出血
E. 咯血
【单选题】
成人呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)血气分析结果,氧分压通常低于下列哪一水平___
A. 8.0kPa
B. 10.7kPa
C. 11.0kPa
D. 11.3kPa
E. 13.3kPa
【单选题】
急性肾衰竭进入多尿期的标志是___
A. 神志清楚
B. 每天尿量超过400ml
C. 发病1周以后
D. 尿量开始增加
E. 每天尿量超过2000ml
【单选题】
预防多系统器官功能衰竭(MSOF)的重要措施是___
A. 处理各种急症时均应有整体观念
B. 重视患者的循环和呼吸功能
C. 防治感染
D. 尽可能改善全身情况
E. 及早治疗首先发生的器官衰竭
【单选题】
急性肾衰竭患者并发肺部感染,首选抗生素___
A. 氯霉素
B. 青霉素
C. 头孢噻吩(先锋霉素I)
D. 磺胺类
E. 氨基糖苷类
【单选题】
MSOF时常先受损的器官是___
A. 肾
B. 肝
C. 脑
D. 心
E. 肺
【单选题】
叙述MSOF的正确概念的是___
A. 在急性疾病的过程中,序贯性地发生2个以上器官功能不全
B. 在急性疾病过程中,同时或相继发生一个以上系统和(或)器官的急性衰竭
C. 长期慢性病理过程中引起多个器官的功能损害
D. 同时有多个器官和(或)系统损害
E. 在疾病过程中有3个以上器官先后衰竭
【单选题】
引起急性肾衰竭少尿期主要的死亡原因是___
A. 水中毒.高钾血症
B. 氮质血症
C. 低钠血症
D. 低钾血症
E. 酸中毒
推荐试题
【单选题】
“任何个别(无论怎样)都是一般”。这句话的正确含义是___
A. 特殊性就是普遍性
B. 特殊性存在于普遍性之中
C. 普遍性是特殊性的总和
D. 特殊性中包含普遍性
【单选题】
在唯物辩证法看来,水果同苹果、梨、香蕉、桔子等的关系是___
A. 共性和个性的关系
B. 整体和部分的关系
C. 本质和现象的关系
D. 内容和形式的关系
【单选题】
“是就是是,不是就是不是,除此之外都是鬼话。”这是一种___
A. 形而上学的观点
B. 相对主义的观点
C. 唯心主义的观点
D. 辩证法的观点
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
“或然率”是指___
A. 可能性在质上的一种科学说明和测定
B. 可能性在量上的一种科学说明和测定
C. 必然性的一种科学说明和判定
D. 偶然性的一种科学说明和测定
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income. While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time. The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005. In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare. Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%. The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly. Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates. What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
现代人才素质的灵魂是___。
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基础.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
世界政治格局发展的必然趋势是___。
A. “多极化”
B. 单边主义
C. 两极格局形成
D. 一超独霸
【单选题】
在全面发展的教育中德、智、体、美是缺一不可,统一存在的,其中处于主导地位的是___。
A. 德育
B. 智育
C. 体育
D. 美育
【单选题】
时代精神的内涵十分丰富,其中___居于核心地位。
A. 艰苦奋斗
B. 自强不息
C. 团结统一
D. 改革创新
【单选题】
民族精神是一个民族赖以生存和发展的精神支撑。中华民族在五千年的发展中所形成的伟大民族精神的核心是___。
A. 爱国主义
B. 人道主义
C. 科学主义
D. 革命英雄主义
【单选题】
下列名言反映中华民族是一个艰苦奋斗的民族的有___。
A. 艰难困苦,玉汝于成
B. 先天下之忧而忧
C. 生于忧患,死于安乐
D. 民无信不立
【单选题】
___是人才素质的基本内容
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
10。___是我们立党立国的根本指导思想
A. 马克思主义
B. 社会主义荣辱观
C. 社会主义思想道德
D. 爱国主义11. 当代大学生的历史使命是(A)
【单选题】
衡量大学生全面发展的一个重要标准是___
A. 知识渊博
B. 品质高尚
C. 德才兼备
D. 知行统一
【单选题】
独立生活意识指___
A. 自己的事情自己处理不需要别人管
B. 自己想干什么就干什么
C. 树立自信、自律、自立、自强的精神
D. 天马行空独来独往
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观
【单选题】
___是人才素质的综合体现.
A. 德
B. 智
C. 体
D. 美
【单选题】
人们对生活在其中的世界及人与世界的关系的总的看法和根本观点就是___
A. 世界观
B. 人生观
C. 价值观
D. 历史观
【单选题】
人生观的核心是___
A. 人生意义
B. 人生目的
C. 人生态度
D. 人生价值
【单选题】
人的本质属性是___
A. 自然属性
B. 自私自利
C. 社会属性
D. 趋利避害
【单选题】
社会主义社会人生价值标准是___
A. 是否拥有金钱财富
B. 自我价值实现的程度
C. 宗教信仰是否虔诚
D. 是否为人民群众尽心尽力服务
【单选题】
回答人为什么活着___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
表明人应当怎样对待生活___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 人生意义
【单选题】
判别什么样的人生才有意义___
A. 人生态度
B. 人生目的
C. 人生价值
D. 价值取向
【单选题】
下列人生态度中正确的是___
A. 认真务实
B. 看破红尘
C. 悲观消沉
D. 满足于现状
【单选题】
下列属于正确的人生目的的是___
A. 追求享乐
B. 为人民服务
C. 追求金钱
D. 追求个人利益
【单选题】
___认为,金钱可以主宰一切.
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___ 认为,社会和他人是达到个人目的的手段。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
___认为,人生的全部内容就在于满足感官的需求与快乐。
A. 享乐主义人生观
B. 拜金主义人生观
C. 功利主义人生观
D. 个人主义人生观
【单选题】
马克思对于人的本质的论断确立与___
A. 《关于费尔巴哈的提纲》
B. 《共产党宣言》
C. 《劳动在才从猿到人转变过程中的作用》D《论黑格尔哲学》
【单选题】
人与自然关系的实质是___
A. 人与人的关系,是社会关系
B. 人对于自然的利用和占有
C. 自然必须服务于人类社会的发展
D. 人与物的占有与被占有的关系
【单选题】
在社会交往和公共生活中公民应该遵守的道德准则是___
A. 职业道德
B. 道德
C. 社会公德
D. 家庭美德