【多选题】
关于经济运行机制方面,毛泽东提出了“两参一改三结合”的思路。其中包括___
A. 企业建立合理的规章制度和严格的责任制
B. 实行民主管理
C. 实行干部参加劳动、工人参加管理
D. 改革不合理的规章制度
E. 工人群众、领导干部和技术人员相结合
查看试卷,进入试卷练习
微信扫一扫,开始刷题

答案
ABCDE
解析
暂无解析
相关试题
【多选题】
党的八大提出,要进一步扩大民主,开展反对官僚主义的斗争,就要做到___
A. 加强对于国家工作的监督,特别是加强党对国家机关的领导和监督
B. 加强全国人民代表大会和它的常务委员会对中央一级政府机关的监督
C. 加强地方各级人民代表大会对地方各级政府机关的监督
D. 加强各级政府机关由上而下和由下而上的监督
E. 加强人民群众和机关中的下级工作人员对于国家机关的监督
【多选题】
下列属于社会主义建设道路初步探索的重要理论成果的有___
A. 调动一切积极因素为社会主义事业服务的思想
B. 正确认识和处理社会主义社会矛盾的思想
C. 走中国工业化道路的思想
D. “三个代表”重要思想
E. 科学发展观
【多选题】
正确把握国情要求必须做到___
A. 把社会性质与社会发展程度统一起来
B. 把社会性质与政党性质统一起来
C. 把政党性质与社会发展程度统一起来
D. 把人口数量与人口受教育程度统一起来
【多选题】
当代中国最大的实际是___
A. 生产力落后,商品经济不发达
B. 社会主义生产关系、上层建筑不完备,不成熟
C. 人口基数大,人均资源水平很低
D. 处于并将长期处于社会主义初级阶段
【多选题】
我国社会主义初级阶段的时间跨度是___
A. 从中华人民共和国成立到社会主义现代化基本实现
B. 从生产资料私有制的社会主义改造基本完成到社会主义现代化的实现
C. 从中华人民共和国成立到生产资料私有制的改造基本完成
D. 从生产资料私有制的社会主义改造基本完成到实现发达的社会主义
【多选题】
我国已经初步形成,逐步推进的开放格局是___
A. 经济特区→沿海开放城市→沿海经济开放区→沿江沿边开放→内地开放
B. 沿海开放城市→经济技术开发区→沿海经济开放区→沿江沿边开放→内地开放
C. 经济特区→沿江沿边开放→沿海开放城市→内地开放
D. 经济特区→沿海开放城市→沿江沿边开放→内地开放
【多选题】
第一次把社会主义初级阶段作为事关全局的基本国情加以把握,明确了这一问题是制定路线、政策的出发点和基本依据的是___
A. 十一届三中全会
B. 十二大
C. 十二届三中全会
D. 十三大
【多选题】
“计划经济不等于社会主义,资本主义也有计划;市场经济不等于资本主义,社会主义也有市场。计划和市场都是经济手段。”对邓小平这一论断的理解不正确的是___
A. 计划和市场都属于社会基本制度的范畴
B. 计划和市场都是资源配置的方式
C. 计划和市场不是社会主义与资本主义的本质区别
D. 社会主义制度下也可以运行市场经济
【多选题】
邓小平曾指出:“现在虽说我们也在搞社会主义,但事实上不够格”。所谓“不够格”,最主要是指___
A. 执政党执政能力不够格
B. 物质技术基础不够格
C. 社会性质方面不够格
D. 人民觉悟不够格
【多选题】
我国社会主义初级阶段是___
A. 任何国家进入社会主义都必须经历的起始阶段
B. 社会主义的不发达阶段
C. 由新民主主义社会向社会主义社会过渡的阶段
D. 由资本主义社会向社会主义社会过渡的阶段
【多选题】
不属于社会主义初级阶段与新民主主义社会的区别的是___
A. 社会主义公有制经济是否成为社会经济的主体
B. 人民的物质文化需要同落后的社会生产之间的矛盾是否成为社会的主要矛盾
C. 社会的生产力水平是否比较低
D. 社会的根本任务是否是发展生产力
【多选题】
在我党的历史文献中第一次使用了“社会主义初级阶段”这一概念是___
A. 1981年《关于建国以来党的若干历史问题的决议》
B. 1982年党的十二大报告
C. 1986年《中共中央关于社会主义精神文明建设指导方针的决议》
D. 1987年十三大报告
【多选题】
1978年5月11日,___发表本报特约评论员文章《实践是检验真理的唯一标准》,引发真理标准问题的大讨论,成为解放思想的先声。
A. 《光明日报》
B. 《人民日报》
C. 《中国日报》
D. 《中国青年报》
【多选题】
我国改革开放以来取得巨大成就的根本原因之一就在于制定的路线、方针、政策合乎___
A. 社会主义的社会性质
B. 人民群众的利益要求
C. 社会主义初级阶段的实际
D. 共产党的执政能力
【多选题】
中共八大和十一届三中全会的相同点是___
A. 都肯定了实事求是的思想路线
B. 都作出了实行改革开放的伟大决策
C. 都把经济建设作为党和国家的工作重点
D. 都结束了长期以来的左倾错误
【多选题】
社会主义初级阶段在各方面先进和落后的并存,是我国基本国情的重要特点,它决定了社会主义初级阶段总的基本特征是:___
A. 逐步摆脱不发达状态,实现社会主义现代化的历史阶段
B. 由农业国逐步转变为工业国的历史阶段
C. 由经济文化发展不平衡逐步变为缩小差距的历史阶段
D. 由自然经济半自然经济占很大比重,逐步转变为经济市场化程度较高的历史阶段
【多选题】
党在社会主义初级阶段的基本路线的“两个基本点”是___
A. 发展社会主义民主,加强社会主义法制
B. 一手抓物质文明,一手抓精神文明
C. 坚持四项基本原则,坚持改革开放
D. 自力更生,艰苦创业
【多选题】
坚持党的社会主义初级阶段的基本路线100年不动摇,关键是坚持___
A. 以经济建设为中心不动摇
B. 自力更生、艰苦创业的方针不动摇
C. 两手抓、两手都要硬的方针不动摇
D. 改革开放不动摇
【多选题】
邓小平在批评“两个凡是”错误观点,强调解放思想的同时,还强调___
A. 民主是解放思想的结果
B. 民主是解放思想的重要条件
C. 民主是解放思想的目的
D. 民主是解放思想的手段
【多选题】
社会主义市场经济中的价格形成机制应该是___
A. 计划价格和市场价格相结合的价格形成机制
B. 主要应该由计划形成的价格机制
C. 以市场供求关系为主形成的价格机制
D. 以政府定价为主的价格机制
推荐试题
【单选题】
真象和假象的区别在于___
A. 真象是客观的,假象是主观的
B. 真象表现本质,假象不表现本质
C. 真象深藏于事物内部,假象外露于事物外部
D. 真象从正面直接地表现本质,假象从反面歪曲地表现本质
【单选题】
有的哲学家说,在大风扬起的尘土中,每一粒尘土的运动状况都是纯粹必然的。这是种___
A. 辩证唯物主义决定论的观点
B. 形而上学的机械决定论的观点
C. 唯心主义非决定论的观点
D. 庸俗唯物主义的观点
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author think of the 2015 report by the Census Bureau?___
A. It is based on questionable statistics.
B. It reflects the economic changes.
C. It evidences the improved welfare.
D. It provides much food for thought.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What does the author say about the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It is widely used to compare the economic growth across countries.
B. It revolutionizes the way of measuring ordinary people’s livelihood.
C. It focuses on people’s consumption rather that their average income.
D. It is a more comprehensive measure of people’s economic well-being.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What do Jones and Klenow think of the comparison between France and the U.S. in terms of real consumption per person?___
A. It reflected the existing big gap between the two economies.
B. It neglected many important indicators of people’s welfare.
C. It covered up the differences between individual citizens.
D. It failed to count in their difference in natural resources.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What is an advantage of the Jones-Klenow method?___
A. It can accurately pinpoint a country’s current economic problems.
B. It can help to raise people’s awareness of their economic well-being.
C. It can diagnose the causes of a country’s slowing pace of economic improvement.
D. It can compare a country’s economic conditions between different periods of time.
【单选题】
Economically speaking, are we better off than we were ten years ago? Twenty years ago?
In their thirst for evidence on this issue, commentators seized on the recent report by the Census Bureau, which found that average household income rose by 5.2% in 2015. Unfortunately, that conclusion puts too much weight on a useful, but flawed and incomplete, statistic. Among the more significant problems with the Census’s measure are that: 1) it excludes taxes, transfers, and compensation like employer-provided health insurance; and 2) it is based on surveys rather than data. Even if precisely measured, income data exclude important determinants of economic well-being, such as the hours of work needed to earn that income.
While thinking about the question, we came across a recently published article by Charles Jones and Peter Klenow, which proposes an interesting new measure of economic welfare. While by no means perfect, it is considerably more comprehensive than average income, taking into account not only growth in consumption per person but also changes in working time, life expectancy, and inequality. Moreover, it can be used to assess economic performance both across countries and over time.
The Jones-Klenow method can be illustrated by a cross-country example. Suppose we want to compare the economic welfare of citizens of the U.S. and France in 2005.
In 2005, as the authors observe, real consumption per person in France was only 60% as high as the U.S., making it appear that Americans were economically much better off than the French on average. However, that comparison omits other relevant factors: leisure time, life expectancy, and economic inequality. The French take longer vacations and retire earlier, so typically work fewer hours; they enjoy a higher life expectancy, presumably reflecting advantages with respect to health care, diet, lifestyle, and the like; and income and consumption are somewhat more equally distributed there than in the U.S. Because of these differences, comparing France’s consumption with the U.S.’s overstates the gap in economic welfare.
Similar calculations can be used to compare the U.S. and other countries. For example, this calculation puts economic welfare in the United Kingdom at 97% of U.S. levels, but estimates Mexican well-being at 22%.
The Jones-Klenow measure can also assess an economy’s performance over time. According to this measure, as of the early-to-mid-2000s, the U.S. had the highest economic welfare of any large country. Since 2007, economic welfare in the U.S. has continued to improve. However, the pace of improvement has slowed markedly.
Methodologically, the lesson from the Jones-Klenow research is that economic welfare is multi-dimensional. Their approach is flexible enough that in principle other important quality-of-life changes could be incorporated—for example, decreases in total emissions of pollutants and declines in crime rates.
What can we infer from the passage about American people’s economic well-being?___
A. It is much better than that of their European counterparts.
B. It has been on the decline ever since the turn of the century.
C. It has not improved as much as reported by the Census Bureau.
D. It has not been accurately assessed and reported since mid-2000s.
【单选题】
大学生的成才目标是___。
A. 培养德智体美全面发展的人才
B. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者
C. 培养德智体美全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人
D. 培养专业化、创新化的人才
【单选题】
___作为社会主义核心价值体系的精髓,解决的是应当具备什么样的精神状态和精神风貌的问题。
A. 马克思主义的指导地位
B. 中国特色社会主义的共同理想
C. 民族精神和时代精神
D. 社会主义荣辱观